| Homestar Runner Wiki Forum http://forum.hrwiki.org/ |
|
| Hmmm... http://forum.hrwiki.org/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=6928 |
Page 2 of 2 |
| Author: | ramrod [ Sun Feb 05, 2006 5:40 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Power Crunch wrote: heh. H*R is not vulgar. It's funny. And the CLEANEST funny I think I've ever seen on the internet. lol. It is. Unless it's the 700 club website, then it's just full of morons.
Ehh...yeah..... H* is definately not vulgar. I mean, it can be somewhat...umm...PG at times, but nothing more than that. Oh, and TOTPD!
|
|
| Author: | ready for prime time [ Sun Feb 05, 2006 9:18 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
TacoBob wrote: Wow..So just mentioning naked ladies is vulgar?
go for Neopets. |
|
| Author: | Homerun Starrer [ Sun Feb 05, 2006 6:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Ugh. Don't even get me started about Neopets and their rules. Toastpaint. |
|
| Author: | The Experimental Film [ Sun Feb 05, 2006 6:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Hee. |
Choc-o-Lardiac Arrest wrote: well atleast were not being ruled by a pubesant 14 year old with a lust for power......wait, what?
That's just because I'm not a mod ye- oh, right. Nah, if anything, Homestar is just getting better. |
|
| Author: | ready for prime time [ Sun Feb 05, 2006 10:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Homerun Starrer wrote: Ugh. Don't even get me started about Neopets and their rules. presicely. they wouldn't let anything a mile to vulgar in. although, i can't believe you can't even write cheat!
Toastpaint. |
|
| Author: | Code J [ Mon Feb 06, 2006 4:03 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
No no no no no no no no. Homestar Runner has not gotten any more adult. Remember Trevor the Vampire? Sisters? Weird Dream? I think thats probably worse than now! [/ranting'n'raving] |
|
| Author: | Kevin DuBrow [ Mon Feb 06, 2006 4:05 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Code J wrote: No no no no no no no no.
Homestar Runner has not gotten any more adult. Remember Trevor the Vampire? Sisters? Weird Dream? I think thats probably worse than now! [/ranting'n'raving] What in trevor the vampire was so bad? I didn't see anything. |
|
| Author: | Ninti [ Mon Feb 06, 2006 4:13 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Strong Bad types: I mean what the f |
|
| Author: | Mr.KISS [ Mon Feb 06, 2006 4:15 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
nintendogs123 wrote: Strong Bad types:
I mean what the f And considering there's an episode of Arthur where DW is swearing half the time (bleeped out) that's practically nothing. |
|
| Author: | ready for prime time [ Mon Feb 06, 2006 8:18 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
remind me what's so bad about Weird Dream? i don't think it was the USA in underpants. i'm not gonna watch it because there's some fish fingers in the oven, they're almost done, and i hate getting up mid-email. |
|
| Author: | Cybernetic Teenybopper [ Mon Feb 06, 2006 7:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Underpants aren't vulgar--everybody wears them, and they're a frequent subject of grade-schooler humor. *shrugs* What can I say? Little kids find odd things funny... there's even kids books about the history of underwear and the like. |
|
| Author: | The Noid [ Mon Feb 06, 2006 7:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Mr.KISS wrote: nintendogs123 wrote: Strong Bad types: I mean what the f And considering there's an episode of Arthur where DW is swearing half the time (bleeped out) that's practically nothing. Uhhh....linkage, please? |
|
| Author: | Musachan [ Mon Feb 06, 2006 10:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Let's consider this: Homestar Runner is independantly run. If they wanted to be vulgar and rude and curse and smoke and drink ... they could without fear of their advertisers bailing out (because they have none). For something that could very well be disgusting and vulgar, and has every chance and right to be, it's just about the cleanest thing ever. The mention of 'naked ladies' is not exactly something you'd throw a warning on. Nah, H*R is good, clean fun at a gradeschool level. |
|
| Author: | Homerun Starrer [ Mon Feb 06, 2006 11:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Yeah, my thoughts exactly. |
|
| Author: | ready for prime time [ Tue Feb 07, 2006 8:04 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
y'know....most people think that Crap is a terrible word. since nobody worries about that, we should close the book on this subject. |
|
| Author: | Douglas [ Tue Feb 07, 2006 2:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
ready for prime time wrote: remind me what's so bad about Weird Dream? i don't think it was the USA in underpants.
Well... *cough* I could see how some people could take it to be... um... vulgar... because of the way Texas looks when the U.S. has underwear on... Don't ask me to explain it more than that. I think they've actually gotten less vulgar than before. Not that I have a problem with a teeny bit of vulgarity. It'll be vulgar to me when they enter into blasphemy and stuff like that. |
|
| Author: | Cybernetic Teenybopper [ Tue Feb 07, 2006 7:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Something just occured to me. I don't think gradeschool kids need corrupting, because I just recalled an obnoxious ditty I learned in, like, first or second grade... Quote: There's a place in France Where the naked ladies dance, There's a hole in the wall Where the men can see it all... ...Ahem. *clears throat*[/quote] |
|
| Author: | ramrod [ Wed Feb 08, 2006 12:19 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Cybernetic Teenybopper wrote: Something just occured to me. I don't think gradeschool kids need corrupting, because I just recalled an obnoxious ditty I learned in, like, first or second grade... Wow...we didn't get anything like that in elementary school. Did you go to a public school? Dang...
Quote: There's a place in France Where the naked ladies dance, There's a hole in the wall Where the men can see it all... ...Ahem. *clears throat* |
|
| Author: | Beyond the Grave [ Wed Feb 08, 2006 12:51 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
ramrod wrote: Cybernetic Teenybopper wrote: Something just occured to me. I don't think gradeschool kids need corrupting, because I just recalled an obnoxious ditty I learned in, like, first or second grade... Wow...we didn't get anything like that in elementary school. Did you go to a public school? Dang...Quote: There's a place in France Where the naked ladies dance, There's a hole in the wall Where the men can see it all... ...Ahem. *clears throat* |
|
| Author: | Mr.KISS [ Wed Feb 08, 2006 12:58 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
The Noid wrote: Mr.KISS wrote: nintendogs123 wrote: Strong Bad types: I mean what the f And considering there's an episode of Arthur where DW is swearing half the time (bleeped out) that's practically nothing. Uhhh....linkage, please? Well, it's on TV so... I don't know what to...do. |
|
| Author: | Joeqjim [ Thu Feb 09, 2006 12:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
ramrod wrote: Cybernetic Teenybopper wrote: Something just occured to me. I don't think gradeschool kids need corrupting, because I just recalled an obnoxious ditty I learned in, like, first or second grade... Wow...we didn't get anything like that in elementary school. Did you go to a public school? Dang...Quote: There's a place in France Where the naked ladies dance, There's a hole in the wall Where the men can see it all... ...Ahem. *clears throat* I've heard that a million times. Although I hardly hear it anymore. |
|
| Author: | ready for prime time [ Thu Feb 09, 2006 8:04 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Douglas wrote: Well... *cough* I could see how some people could take it to be... um... vulgar... because of the way Texas looks when the U.S. has underwear on...
oh please. if that was considered vulgar then speedos would have been outlawed several times. |
|
| Author: | Strong Josh [ Sat Feb 11, 2006 7:01 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
One thing that surprised me was in Space Program when the narrator said "Hey! You're not smoking a nice relaxing cigarette at all!" And then the NASA guy starts smoking and the narrator's like "That's more like it!" or something. And the whole naked ladies thing caught me off guard too. Although, why do you guys think the Tandy emails were worse? |
|
| Author: | Cybernetic Teenybopper [ Sun Feb 12, 2006 12:55 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I'm guessing the reason people think the Tandy e-mails were worse might have something to do with the fact that they were just a little more edgy--like the one about flipping the bird, and a few other things. To be honest, although I can personally sort of see it too, I'm not sure how to phrase it. |
|
| Author: | ready for prime time [ Wed Feb 15, 2006 8:14 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Beyond the Grave wrote: I haven't heard that one, but I have heard the other story of Jack and Jill.
out of curiosity...... |
|
| Author: | Beyond the Grave [ Wed Feb 15, 2006 3:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
ready for prime time wrote: Beyond the Grave wrote: I haven't heard that one, but I have heard the other story of Jack and Jill. out of curiosity...... |
|
| Author: | ready for prime time [ Wed Feb 22, 2006 8:11 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
okay then. why do people always use the argument "but it was based on a childerens book!" it's obviously not anymore. |
|
| Author: | Lunar Jesty [ Wed Feb 22, 2006 1:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
ready for prime time wrote: okay then.
why do people always use the argument "but it was based on a childerens book!" it's obviously not anymore. I think it is. The Children's Book still had the absurdist roots, and that's really why Homestar is still about: weirding you out. |
|
| Author: | ready for prime time [ Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:53 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
okay, i've thought of an argument: H*R is NOT inappropriate. why, you ask? compare it to the simpsons. there are no 'football in the groin' type jokes in H*R. i rest my case. okay, so it's one little detail, but it counts. |
|
| Author: | Not A Fruit [ Tue Mar 14, 2006 9:48 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
H*R has humour of all types, that's why it's such a success, and some people appreciate vulgarity more than subtlety. |
|
| Page 2 of 2 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|