How do I create my own wiki? (mine won't be about h*r, don't worry
)
I love your wiki! I'm going to visit it more often!
| Homestar Runner Wiki Forum http://forum.hrwiki.org/ |
|
| Help please! http://forum.hrwiki.org/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=8070 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | teh chortttt [ Wed Apr 26, 2006 11:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Help please! |
How do I create my own wiki? (mine won't be about h*r, don't worry )
I love your wiki! I'm going to visit it more often!
|
|
| Author: | Lunar Jesty [ Wed Apr 26, 2006 11:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
What kind of wiki do you want? What will it be about? |
|
| Author: | teh chortttt [ Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:23 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
It would be about RuneScape. (I'm obsessed with that game lol) |
|
| Author: | InterruptorJones [ Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:24 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
teh chortttt wrote: It would be about RuneScape. (I'm obsessed with that game lol)
The first step to making a new wiki is: Google it, 'cause somebody else did it first. |
|
| Author: | Choc-o-Lardiac Arrest [ Thu Apr 27, 2006 4:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Awesome! a runescape wiki! |
|
| Author: | andrew [ Thu Apr 27, 2006 1:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
If that wiki isn't the victim of vandalism, I'm a bit perplexed. EDIT: Heh, nevermind. I guess it happens to everyone now and again. |
|
| Author: | TCIndiana [ Thu Apr 27, 2006 7:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I personally don't thinkn an amatuer wiki is a good idea (especially if there is already a more popular one out there) since without people constantly patrolling the recent changes there can be a lot of vandalism. |
|
| Author: | InterruptorJones [ Thu Apr 27, 2006 8:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
TCIndiana wrote: I personally don't thinkn an amatuer wiki is a good idea (especially if there is already a more popular one out there) since without people constantly patrolling the recent changes there can be a lot of vandalism.
"Amateur wiki"? What the heck are you talking about? There's not a successful public wiki out there that isn't managed more or less exclusively by amateurs. Like oh, I dunno, ours? |
|
| Author: | Jello B. [ Thu Apr 27, 2006 8:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I have no idea what the crap I'm doing with the NWFCWiki, but it's got 170 somethin' members. 
|
|
| Author: | TCIndiana [ Fri Apr 28, 2006 4:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
InterruptorJones wrote: TCIndiana wrote: I personally don't thinkn an amatuer wiki is a good idea (especially if there is already a more popular one out there) since without people constantly patrolling the recent changes there can be a lot of vandalism. "Amateur wiki"? What the heck are you talking about? There's not a successful public wiki out there that isn't managed more or less exclusively by amateurs. Like oh, I dunno, ours? I guess I should have phrased that differently... Newbie wikis? What I mean is a wiki managed by only one or two people that has little chance of gaining popularity due to another more popular wiki on the same subject. |
|
| Author: | InterruptorJones [ Fri Apr 28, 2006 4:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
TCIndiana wrote: I guess I should have phrased that differently... Newbie wikis?
What I mean is a wiki managed by only one or two people that has little chance of gaining popularity due to another more popular wiki on the same subject. Well, the latter is true. Having two competing wikis on the same topic is counterproductive and seems to go against the wiki spirit. As far as newbies in small numbers, though, I disagree: JoeyDay started the HRWiki all by himself without much wiki experience. It took awhile to take off, but when it did, wow. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|