Homestar Runner Wiki Forum

A companion to the Homestar Runner Wiki
It is currently Tue Mar 19, 2024 7:01 am

All times are UTC




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 328 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 3:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 3:10 pm
Posts: 3999
Location: Sims 2
Acekirby wrote:
SnowyFox wrote:
Its art is beyond lazy

THUS THE HUMOR


I sort of understand what you're saying. Except it isn't really that funny.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 4:25 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2005 5:35 pm
Posts: 3094
ChickenLeg wrote:
Acekirby wrote:
SnowyFox wrote:
Its art is beyond lazy

THUS THE HUMOR


I sort of understand what you're saying. Except it isn't really that funny.

SnowyFox wrote:
The Noid wrote:
Quote:
...Unless those are the two worst comics on the site, that looks like a terrible comic to me. Its art is beyond lazy, but entirely without charm, the jokes are dumb and pointless, and it lacks any structure, as well as the level of humor necessary to make that work.


You furries should laugh at furry jokes! Embrace your mockings!
We should... Unfortunately there was no joke there at all. "Oh look we're burning people who are different" is the closest thing to a joke I could find. The Puritans thought of that joke already, and they LITERALLY thought humor was the devil. This guy, on the other hand, has made humor his hobby or even his job. Making fun of furries is pretty much the single richest source of jokes on the internet yet the joke he chose to excavate from it was... nothing. And that's just one comic.

...I'm starting to sound awfully hostile. I have no grudge against this comic, it's just so bad I feel the need to strongly express that opinion. That's all.


Just to let you know, I hate both of you.
It's for different reasons, though.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 1:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 6:45 pm
Posts: 5441
Location: living in the sunling, loving in the moonlight, having a wonderful time.
Hey guys, time to start a controversy of my own!

I... I actually chuckled at CAD today >.>

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 3:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 3:10 pm
Posts: 3999
Location: Sims 2
Nothing to be ashamed of, Ido.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 6:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 1:33 am
Posts: 14288
Location: Wouldn't you like to know?
Capt. Ido Nos wrote:
Hey guys, time to start a controversy of my own!

I... I actually chuckled at CAD today >.>

It wasn't half bad, I'll give it that.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 7:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 7:27 pm
Posts: 11940
Location: Puttin the voodoo in the stew, I'm tellin you
Not a bad joke, I'd say. But once again Tim oversells it. Scorpion didn't need to say "DOH". The joke was actually really good without it.

Either way, Tim should really just be doing those little mini-strips. I enjoy them far more than the actual "main" comic he's trying to put out.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 7:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 6:45 pm
Posts: 5441
Location: living in the sunling, loving in the moonlight, having a wonderful time.
Acekirby wrote:
Not a bad joke, I'd say. But once again Tim oversells it. Scorpion didn't need to say "DOH". The joke was actually really good without it.

Actually... I... kinda... liked the 'Doh'

cek wrote:
Either way, Tim should really just be doing those little mini-strips. I enjoy them far more than the actual "main" comic he's trying to put out.

This is even more true, though.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 7:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 2:14 pm
Posts: 8899
Location: looking at my post and/or profile
From the old webcomics thread:

Quote:
No, the most inappropriate comic ever would be SL.


sexy losers?

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 10:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 3:10 pm
Posts: 3999
Location: Sims 2
Ninti wrote:
Just to let you know, I hate both of you.
It's for different reasons, though.


I thought you were cool.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 11:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2005 5:35 pm
Posts: 3094
Your mistake


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
PostPosted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 1:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 10:51 pm
Posts: 2378
Location: In the Aeroplane over the Sea
Indexed.

I do love Venn diagrams.

_________________
Sister, now that we're grieving
Our fingers will falter
Our lungs will be leaking
All over each other and without even speaking
We'll know that it's over and smile and go greeting
Whatever comes next


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
PostPosted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 2:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 10:25 pm
Posts: 2439
Location: Empire of Sparkletania
The Noid wrote:
From the old webcomics thread:

Quote:
No, the most inappropriate comic ever would be SL.


sexy losers?

Too bad none of it's funny.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
PostPosted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 3:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 6:08 am
Posts: 351
Location: Nuclear Class Submarine "Soccermom"
No Toppings wrote:
Indexed.

I do love Venn diagrams.
Indexed is awesome from time to time. Unfortunately the rest of them are just meh, in my opinion.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
PostPosted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 6:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 7:27 pm
Posts: 11940
Location: Puttin the voodoo in the stew, I'm tellin you
Just so you guys know Girly is a god among mortal Webcomics.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
PostPosted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 6:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 6:45 pm
Posts: 5441
Location: living in the sunling, loving in the moonlight, having a wonderful time.
Image
Look, an internet reference!

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
PostPosted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 10:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 10:48 pm
Posts: 130
Location: SNOOPING AS USUAL, I SEE
GADZOOKS!

_________________
Argh.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
PostPosted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 10:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 12:35 am
Posts: 646
Location: On your couch chillin' with your girlfriend, watching Bottle Rocket and laughing 'till the very end.
Mini-Trogdor SP wrote:


Whoa! Good find man, haha. The Soul Calibur VII comic made me lol everywheres.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 1:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 1:33 am
Posts: 14288
Location: Wouldn't you like to know?
Mini-Trogdor SP wrote:

I think I just fell in love.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 4:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 10:28 pm
Posts: 4675
I understand

Buckley killed off the baby because he sucks at drawing them

_________________
Image
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 4:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 10:25 pm
Posts: 2439
Location: Empire of Sparkletania
extremejon09 wrote:
I understand

Buckley killed off the baby because he sucks at drawing them

Image
Bobby Hill?

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 6:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 6:08 am
Posts: 351
Location: Nuclear Class Submarine "Soccermom"
I was reading back on the first few pages to check out some of the comics, and I can't believe I missed this the first time.
Marshmallow Roast wrote:
Better Days! (note: this contains furries, but i'm willing to overlook that for the plot... also, some themes are NSFW, etc.)
"Some themes are NSFW." I think that's the understatement of the century, considering it's a comic that at one point contained rape, incest, pedophilia and murder at the exact same time. Not to mention another case of rape, what would be statutory rape if the rapist weren't 11, repeated cases of garden variety incest, and the fact that the recent comics read like a porno with the explicit scenes taken out (or at least what I imagine a porno would be like.) Just found that statement amusing is all. It's actually not a bad comic. :P

Also, I agree, the Soul Calibur VII comic was absolutely priceless.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 3:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 4:09 pm
Posts: 805
Location: One tequila, two tequila, three tequila, floor...
proof that Life Imitates XKCD

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 3:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 6:45 pm
Posts: 5441
Location: living in the sunling, loving in the moonlight, having a wonderful time.
The discussion for the page is pretty hilarious too. That man has some serious influence power, he does he does.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 3:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 09, 2004 10:36 pm
Posts: 4328
Location: The island. Where and when that is I cannot say...
This happens every single time Wikipedia is mentioned in any form of media, ever. It was kind of funny when Colbert told people to deliberately vandalize it, it is not funny when you just imitate something you saw in a webcomic. *sigh*

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 4:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 6:08 am
Posts: 351
Location: Nuclear Class Submarine "Soccermom"
Yeah that's kind of lame. The comic itself was kind of funny, but that doesn't mean doing it for real would be.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 6:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 7:27 pm
Posts: 11940
Location: Puttin the voodoo in the stew, I'm tellin you
Dark Grapefruit wrote:
This happens every single time Wikipedia is mentioned in any form of media, ever. It was kind of funny when Colbert told people to deliberately vandalize it, it is not funny when you just imitate something you saw in a webcomic. *sigh*

Exactly. I knew the Wikipedia Page was going to be changed the second I saw that.

Also why does he reference Firefly so much? If he likes it, cool, he can make some references, but I've seen far too many.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
PostPosted: Fri Jul 11, 2008 5:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 8:41 pm
Posts: 815
The last panel of the new Dr. McNinja needs to be a colored wallpaper.
For some reason I posted this in the Movies Coming Soon thread by accident.

_________________
"If at first you don't succeed, call in an air strike." -Unknown


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
PostPosted: Fri Jul 11, 2008 7:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 6:45 pm
Posts: 5441
Location: living in the sunling, loving in the moonlight, having a wonderful time.
Heh, the current story button doesn't point to the right page...

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 1:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 6:45 pm
Posts: 5441
Location: living in the sunling, loving in the moonlight, having a wonderful time.
That guy who did Rice Boy is making something new, sweet.

Also, Pear-Pear is still interesting.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 11:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 3:52 am
Posts: 2044
Location: yep
Capt. Ido Nos wrote:
aw hecks yes. I like the art style so far.

Also:

Image

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 328 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group