Homestar Runner Wiki Forum
http://forum.hrwiki.org/

Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
http://forum.hrwiki.org/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=13629		 Page 10 of 11
Author:  ChickenLeg [ Mon Jul 07, 2008 3:30 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
Acekirby wrote:
SnowyFox wrote:
Its art is beyond lazy

THUS THE HUMOR


I sort of understand what you're saying. Except it isn't really that funny.
Author:  Ninti [ Mon Jul 07, 2008 4:25 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
ChickenLeg wrote:
Acekirby wrote:
SnowyFox wrote:
Its art is beyond lazy

THUS THE HUMOR


I sort of understand what you're saying. Except it isn't really that funny.

SnowyFox wrote:
The Noid wrote:
Quote:
...Unless those are the two worst comics on the site, that looks like a terrible comic to me. Its art is beyond lazy, but entirely without charm, the jokes are dumb and pointless, and it lacks any structure, as well as the level of humor necessary to make that work.


You furries should laugh at furry jokes! Embrace your mockings!
We should... Unfortunately there was no joke there at all. "Oh look we're burning people who are different" is the closest thing to a joke I could find. The Puritans thought of that joke already, and they LITERALLY thought humor was the devil. This guy, on the other hand, has made humor his hobby or even his job. Making fun of furries is pretty much the single richest source of jokes on the internet yet the joke he chose to excavate from it was... nothing. And that's just one comic.

...I'm starting to sound awfully hostile. I have no grudge against this comic, it's just so bad I feel the need to strongly express that opinion. That's all.


Just to let you know, I hate both of you.
It's for different reasons, though.
Author:  Capt. Ido Nos [ Mon Jul 07, 2008 1:52 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
Hey guys, time to start a controversy of my own!

I... I actually chuckled at CAD today >.>
Author:  ChickenLeg [ Mon Jul 07, 2008 3:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
Nothing to be ashamed of, Ido.
Author:  ramrod [ Mon Jul 07, 2008 6:56 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
Capt. Ido Nos wrote:
Hey guys, time to start a controversy of my own!

I... I actually chuckled at CAD today >.>

It wasn't half bad, I'll give it that.
Author:  Acekirby [ Mon Jul 07, 2008 7:12 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
Not a bad joke, I'd say. But once again Tim oversells it. Scorpion didn't need to say "DOH". The joke was actually really good without it.

Either way, Tim should really just be doing those little mini-strips. I enjoy them far more than the actual "main" comic he's trying to put out.
Author:  Capt. Ido Nos [ Mon Jul 07, 2008 7:18 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
Acekirby wrote:
Not a bad joke, I'd say. But once again Tim oversells it. Scorpion didn't need to say "DOH". The joke was actually really good without it.

Actually... I... kinda... liked the 'Doh'

cek wrote:
Either way, Tim should really just be doing those little mini-strips. I enjoy them far more than the actual "main" comic he's trying to put out.

This is even more true, though.
Author:  The Noid [ Mon Jul 07, 2008 7:24 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
From the old webcomics thread:

Quote:
No, the most inappropriate comic ever would be SL.


sexy losers?
Author:  ChickenLeg [ Mon Jul 07, 2008 10:52 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
Ninti wrote:
Just to let you know, I hate both of you.
It's for different reasons, though.


I thought you were cool.
Author:  Ninti [ Mon Jul 07, 2008 11:16 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
Your mistake
Author:  No Toppings [ Tue Jul 08, 2008 1:19 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
Indexed.

I do love Venn diagrams.
Author:  Mr. Sparkle [ Tue Jul 08, 2008 2:35 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
The Noid wrote:
From the old webcomics thread:

Quote:
No, the most inappropriate comic ever would be SL.


sexy losers?

Too bad none of it's funny.
Author:  SnowyFox [ Tue Jul 08, 2008 3:22 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
No Toppings wrote:
Indexed.

I do love Venn diagrams.
Indexed is awesome from time to time. Unfortunately the rest of them are just meh, in my opinion.
Author:  Acekirby [ Tue Jul 08, 2008 6:32 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
Just so you guys know Girly is a god among mortal Webcomics.
Author:  Capt. Ido Nos [ Tue Jul 08, 2008 6:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
Image
Look, an internet reference!
Author:  Mini-Trogdor SP [ Tue Jul 08, 2008 10:07 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
GADZOOKS!
Author:  Beaums [ Tue Jul 08, 2008 10:37 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
Mini-Trogdor SP wrote:
GADZOOKS!


Whoa! Good find man, haha. The Soul Calibur VII comic made me lol everywheres.
Author:  ramrod [ Wed Jul 09, 2008 1:46 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
Mini-Trogdor SP wrote:
GADZOOKS!

I think I just fell in love.
Author:  extremejon09 [ Wed Jul 09, 2008 4:36 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
I understand

Buckley killed off the baby because he sucks at drawing them
Author:  Mr. Sparkle [ Wed Jul 09, 2008 4:44 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
extremejon09 wrote:
I understand

Buckley killed off the baby because he sucks at drawing them

Image
Bobby Hill?
Author:  SnowyFox [ Wed Jul 09, 2008 6:47 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
I was reading back on the first few pages to check out some of the comics, and I can't believe I missed this the first time.
Marshmallow Roast wrote:
Better Days! (note: this contains furries, but i'm willing to overlook that for the plot... also, some themes are NSFW, etc.)
"Some themes are NSFW." I think that's the understatement of the century, considering it's a comic that at one point contained rape, incest, pedophilia and murder at the exact same time. Not to mention another case of rape, what would be statutory rape if the rapist weren't 11, repeated cases of garden variety incest, and the fact that the recent comics read like a porno with the explicit scenes taken out (or at least what I imagine a porno would be like.) Just found that statement amusing is all. It's actually not a bad comic. :P

Also, I agree, the Soul Calibur VII comic was absolutely priceless.
Author:  Potates [ Wed Jul 09, 2008 3:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
proof that Life Imitates XKCD
Author:  Capt. Ido Nos [ Wed Jul 09, 2008 3:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
The discussion for the page is pretty hilarious too. That man has some serious influence power, he does he does.
Author:  Dark Grapefruit [ Wed Jul 09, 2008 3:59 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
This happens every single time Wikipedia is mentioned in any form of media, ever. It was kind of funny when Colbert told people to deliberately vandalize it, it is not funny when you just imitate something you saw in a webcomic. *sigh*
Author:  SnowyFox [ Wed Jul 09, 2008 4:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
Yeah that's kind of lame. The comic itself was kind of funny, but that doesn't mean doing it for real would be.
Author:  Acekirby [ Wed Jul 09, 2008 6:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
Dark Grapefruit wrote:
This happens every single time Wikipedia is mentioned in any form of media, ever. It was kind of funny when Colbert told people to deliberately vandalize it, it is not funny when you just imitate something you saw in a webcomic. *sigh*

Exactly. I knew the Wikipedia Page was going to be changed the second I saw that.

Also why does he reference Firefly so much? If he likes it, cool, he can make some references, but I've seen far too many.
Author:  gunluva [ Fri Jul 11, 2008 5:08 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
The last panel of the new Dr. McNinja needs to be a colored wallpaper.
For some reason I posted this in the Movies Coming Soon thread by accident.
Author:  Capt. Ido Nos [ Fri Jul 11, 2008 7:38 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
Heh, the current story button doesn't point to the right page...
Author:  Capt. Ido Nos [ Tue Jul 15, 2008 1:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
That guy who did Rice Boy is making something new, sweet.

Also, Pear-Pear is still interesting.
Author:  Homerun Starrer [ Tue Jul 15, 2008 11:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Webcomics that are GOOD and not CAD- er, bad
Capt. Ido Nos wrote:
That guy who did Rice Boy is making something new, sweet.
aw hecks yes. I like the art style so far.

Also:

Image
Page 10 of 11 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/