| Homestar Runner Wiki Forum http://forum.hrwiki.org/ |
|
| King Kong http://forum.hrwiki.org/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=6315 |
Page 2 of 2 |
| Author: | Kevin DuBrow [ Tue Dec 20, 2005 4:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
iKipapa wrote: A Kevin DuBrow Christmas wrote: I've seen the 1537 original film... Roffle. Now that's an old movie!  No, I haven't seen Kong. And, I don't plan to. My brother will force me to watchit when he gets it on DVD, so, I guess I'll watch it then. I really hope you guys know that the film was actually made in the 1930's or 40's. |
|
| Author: | FireBird [ Tue Dec 20, 2005 4:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Kevin DuBrow wrote: iKipapa wrote: A Kevin DuBrow Christmas wrote: I've seen the 1537 original film... Roffle. Now that's an old movie! No, I haven't seen Kong. And, I don't plan to. My brother will force me to watchit when he gets it on DVD, so, I guess I'll watch it then. I really hope you guys know that the film was actually made in the 1930's or 40's. 1933, to be exact. |
|
| Author: | The_Other_White_Meat [ Tue Dec 20, 2005 7:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I can't wait until the DVD comes out, because then I can watch it until I get sick of it and never want to see it again - just like Lord of the Rings!!! |
|
| Author: | Kevin DuBrow [ Tue Dec 20, 2005 8:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
FireBird wrote: Kevin DuBrow wrote: iKipapa wrote: A Kevin DuBrow Christmas wrote: I've seen the 1537 original film... Roffle. Now that's an old movie! No, I haven't seen Kong. And, I don't plan to. My brother will force me to watchit when he gets it on DVD, so, I guess I'll watch it then. I really hope you guys know that the film was actually made in the 1930's or 40's. 1933, to be exact. Yeah, what Philip said. |
|
| Author: | Kevin DuBrow [ Tue Dec 20, 2005 8:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
FireBird wrote: Kevin DuBrow wrote: iKipapa wrote: A Kevin DuBrow Christmas wrote: I've seen the 1537 original film... Roffle. Now that's an old movie! No, I haven't seen Kong. And, I don't plan to. My brother will force me to watchit when he gets it on DVD, so, I guess I'll watch it then. I really hope you guys know that the film was actually made in the 1930's or 40's. 1933, to be exact. Yeah, what Philip said. 1933 is the year. Everybody, listen to Philip...I mean Firebird. |
|
| Author: | Acekirby [ Tue Dec 20, 2005 10:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
InterruptorJones wrote: A Kevin DuBrow Christmas wrote: Nobody spoil anything in this movie because I want to see it. It looks really cool. Peter Jackson has done it again!! Er.. if you don't want it spoiled, you probably shouldn't read this (language warning). Heh heh. I immediatly thought of that comic when I saw that post. InterruptorJones wrote: Acekirby wrote: Too many long, drawn out scenes with Kong and the woman, though. I thought these were among the movie's best scenes. Without them the audience would never have been able to feel any compassion for Kong, which is the whole point of the movie. I enjoyed those scenes a lot as well, I just thought that there were a tad too many of them. I dunno, I guess I just thought they moves a little too slow for my tastes. Well, whatever. A solid movie nonetheless. |
|
| Page 2 of 2 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|