| Homestar Runner Wiki Forum http://forum.hrwiki.org/ |
|
| scary movie 4 http://forum.hrwiki.org/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=7787 |
Page 2 of 2 |
| Author: | Tompkins [ Sun Apr 16, 2006 3:27 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Santa Zeno wrote: Tompkins wrote: Dactyl wrote: Were you not old enough to see it by yourself? I'm only 13. I said I was 14, but they didn't fall for it. Errr... how can they tell one year's difference? Have the Canadians developed some kinda psychic age-guessing powers? I look WAAAAAAAY to young to be 13! BUT I AM! Stupid theaters... |
|
| Author: | Choc-o-Lardiac Arrest [ Sun Apr 16, 2006 3:31 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
this movie was awesome... |
|
| Author: | PianoManGidley [ Sun Apr 16, 2006 3:32 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Tompkins wrote: Santa Zeno wrote: Tompkins wrote: Dactyl wrote: Were you not old enough to see it by yourself? I'm only 13. I said I was 14, but they didn't fall for it. Errr... how can they tell one year's difference? Have the Canadians developed some kinda psychic age-guessing powers? I look WAAAAAAAY to young to be 13! BUT I AM! Stupid theaters... That...doesn't seem right regardless of what age you are. PG-13 (or -14) means "Parental Guidance SUGGESTED"...NOT "Parental Guidance REQUIRED." They should let anyone with the money in to see the film....it just doesn't sound legal to me anyway else. |
|
| Author: | StrongRad [ Sun Apr 16, 2006 3:52 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
PianoManGidley wrote: Tompkins wrote: Santa Zeno wrote: Tompkins wrote: Dactyl wrote: Were you not old enough to see it by yourself? I'm only 13. I said I was 14, but they didn't fall for it. Errr... how can they tell one year's difference? Have the Canadians developed some kinda psychic age-guessing powers? I look WAAAAAAAY to young to be 13! BUT I AM! Stupid theaters... That...doesn't seem right regardless of what age you are. PG-13 (or -14) means "Parental Guidance SUGGESTED"...NOT "Parental Guidance REQUIRED." They should let anyone with the money in to see the film....it just doesn't sound legal to me anyway else. Well, technically, since they're a private business, they have the right to refuse service to whomever they want. My guess is that not letting kidlets into PG-13 movies is more of a "CYA" procedure than anything else. |
|
| Author: | Dactyl [ Wed Apr 19, 2006 11:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Scary Movie 4 sucked, but ZOMG CLERKS 2 TRAILER!!!!! I CAN'T WAIT!!!! |
|
| Author: | EveryoneLovesStevenRight? [ Thu Apr 20, 2006 7:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Cindy: There was this hand! and a face!1 I forget the name: did it have a nose? Cindy: YES! IFTN: that does sound like a face... ROFFLELMAO'D |
|
| Author: | Shopiom [ Thu Apr 20, 2006 7:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
His name is Tom. Tom Ryan. |
|
| Author: | The Noid [ Thu Apr 20, 2006 7:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I really think it's a load of crap that you can't get into a PG-13 movie if you're not 13. I was watching PG-13 movies in like...second grade. |
|
| Author: | EveryoneLovesStevenRight? [ Thu Apr 20, 2006 7:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Oh... well excuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuseeeee me princess |
|
| Author: | Shopiom [ Thu Apr 20, 2006 7:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
You're excused. |
|
| Author: | Duecex2 [ Fri Apr 21, 2006 12:03 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Dactyl wrote: Scary Movie 4 sucked, but ZOMG CLERKS 2 TRAILER!!!!! I CAN'T WAIT!!!!
I thought Scary Movie 4 was OK, didn't suck, but wasn't awesome. I'm phsyced for Clerks 2. I was cracking up everytime I saw Jay and Silent Bob in the trailer. |
|
| Author: | Kevin DuBrow [ Fri Apr 21, 2006 1:24 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Some of my friends saw this movie, and they said it was hilarious, especially the part with Shaq. |
|
| Author: | Code J [ Fri Apr 21, 2006 1:30 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
My friends and I keep quoting: "This is Detroit. This is Detroit after the attack." |
|
| Page 2 of 2 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|