Didymus wrote:
And considering that you started your posting in this thread essentially rejoicing at the girl's death, I can't help but feel your opinion carries about as much weight as pocket lint. My advice to you: go back to your bridge and wait for the goats.
Ok, maybe I was going a little overboard with what I began posting here. I didn't mean to sound like I was rejoicing her death, I was just trying to say (in perhaps an overly aggressive manner) that there was a lot of things that could be done to prevent this. It's never a good thing when people die, especially when the person takes his or her own life. I'm still at a loss as to why this girl wasn't getting professional help.
Cola wrote:
But the question is, what is normal?
This right here is the $64,000 question. Is anybody really "normal"? IMO, there's no such thing as "normal".
Cola wrote:
Second, all these are are just veils of common things everyone goes through shrouded in words that psychiatrist use to tell parents that their kids are either dumb, bored with life, or show no interest in interacting with other kids.
Well, there's clearly something wrong with the kid if he or she is bored with life or isn't interested in interacting with other people. Humans are by nature supposed to be social. Look at us, for instance. We happen to have an interest in Homestar Runner, so we seek out this forum and post on it so we can share that interest with other people. But when someone shows little or no interest in interacting with other people, then there's cause for concern.
Cola wrote:
Also, you're pretty much saying that the normal American family is a white Husband, Wife, and two kids; boy and a girl, the girls is into unicorns and pink, and the boy is into baseball and playing videogames; the wife knows her place and stays at home to do house work, and feed the kids, make dinner, and all that good stuff, and that the husband goes off to work, comes home at five in a business suit and hat, is greeted at the door by his loving wife and kids, while dinner has just be set down on the table, hot and fresh and awaiting his return, and everyone is happy and explains their problems to each other so that everyone may get along.
Where do you get this impression? I'm not seeing this at all.
Cola wrote:
And one more thing, you don't need pills to cure depression. You just need to talk to someone, own up to yourself, and realize that you're only making yourself feel worse by letting it take a hold of you.
YES! Depression is a slippery slope. If you find yourself increasingly sad, then talk to someone that you can trust. If you start to feel sad, then you start to think, "nobody cares," and that makes you feel even more sad. Talking to someone that you can trust will go a long way towards making you feel better, and MySpace is, IMO, not the place for that.
John wrote:
So, OK. I feel bad for this girl, but I can't help thinking it's just as much her parents' fault as it is the other family. If you can't see the level of unhappiness and depression that your kid is having because of unhealthy online relationships, and you don't do anything to remedy the situation, this is the kind of thing that can happen.
Agreed 100% here. The teenage years are some of the years when a parent needs to be the most active in a child's life, even if the kid doesn't want that to be so. The parents need to be sure that the kid is safe, and I don't think that this was done in this case.
Didymus wrote:
Now, there was a time I thought as Cola and DaThnikka, that a person who suffered such depression just needed to get over it.
My line of thinking is that most people who suffer from depression do need to get over it. However, there will always be those people whose depression stems from something biological, like you said, and those people obviously can't just "get over it." But do we know for a fact that this girl's depression was biological in nature? Either way, she should have been getting help, instead of playing around on MySpace.