Problems I have with Clinton:
*Her stance on illegal immigration: Not the one she claims to have, but the one that's led her to threaten to filibuster immigration bills. Obama, on the other hand has authored bills to block illegal immigration and punish those who would be here illegally.
*Energy Policy: If we're going to break ourselves from foreign oil, we need more drilling. If all but the fields in the Arctic Wildlife Refuge areas are tapped, then we're going to have to tap those. If can be in a way that minimizes environmental impact, provided people try to do so. It wouldn't be the only potentially damaging activity we have going on in a sensitive ecological area. I'm also against the US ratifying the Kyoto treats. It's based on bad science and there's no real proof that it'll provide any useful benefit for the economic investments it'd take. (I'm not out to destroy the planet, regardless of how my take on energy might sound.)
*Education: I really don't like the argument wikipedia listed. It's full of logical fallacy, and it's an argument that can easily be fixed. Aren't schools accredited some way or another? All you have to say is that the vouchers can only go to schools that meet some set of accreditation criteria. Poor children in poor neighborhoods deserve the same right to high quality education as rich, privately schooled children. (Wow, I think I actually sound more liberal than Clinton on this one)
*Abortion: Pure and simple, unless someone's life is in danger or rape was involved, I don't think abortion should be allowed. Your parents can't kill you just because you're an inconvenience, the same right should extend to your unborn sibling.
*Gun Control: I am not a fan of gun control (to put it mildly). I do not think lawsuits should be allowed against firearms manufacturers if the products are used in a way they were not intended by the manufacturers (Smith and Wesson does not make guns for the express purpose of murder and gang violence). I also find the fact that she voted to allow (by voting against a bill that would prevent) seizure of lawfully owned firearms during a disaster. Law-abiding citizens who are not causing trouble should not have property taken from them (4th amendment). Bad weather is not "just cause".
*Video games: While it IS true that she supports the sale of M rated games to those over 18 (good idea), she also seems to want to blame games for problems that kids would have without them.
Quote:
She said, "Children are playing a game that encourages them to have sex with prostitutes and then murder them. This is a silent epidemic of media desensitisation that teaches kids it’s OK to diss people because they are a woman, they’re a different color or they’re from a different place."
Now, I'm not saying she's the devil, don't get that impression.
Unlike some people, I'll admit when my adversaries are correct.
Clinton's take on Israel is spot on (or close to it, I don't know how far she's willing to take "solidarity and support for Israel), as are her takes on humanitarian intervention and the fact that she supports the rights of students to pray and does not wish to inhibit their use of religion in assignments.