Homestar Runner Wiki Forum

A companion to the Homestar Runner Wiki
It is currently Mon Sep 18, 2023 7:11 am

All times are UTC




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 67 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 21, 2007 1:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 10:46 pm
Posts: 993
Location: In the Palace of No Wai, sipping PWN JOO Chai
I know I'm off-topic with this, but I'll be quick.

StrongRad wrote:
*Energy Policy: If we're going to break ourselves from foreign oil, we need more drilling. If all but the fields in the Arctic Wildlife Refuge areas are tapped, then we're going to have to tap those. If can be in a way that minimizes environmental impact, provided people try to do so. It wouldn't be the only potentially damaging activity we have going on in a sensitive ecological area. I'm also against the US ratifying the Kyoto treats. It's based on bad science and there's no real proof that it'll provide any useful benefit for the economic investments it'd take. (I'm not out to destroy the planet, regardless of how my take on energy might sound.)


My understanding is that Clinton supports releasing more oil reserves, just not in places like the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, as you said yourself. Has she since changed her tune, then?

About the Kyoto Agreement - I'd be interested to know what you mean by "bad science". I know there are some scientists who are skeptical about Man's role in climate change, but many of them simply say that it's presently unclear how much Man is to blame for climate change. Which is a fair point - at least to my untutored opinion - but to me that doesn't constitute conclusive evidence that the Kyoto inititive is a waste of time.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 21, 2007 2:48 pm 
Offline
Pizza Pizza
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2004 4:05 pm
Posts: 10451
Location: probably the penalty box
What's Her Face wrote:
About the Kyoto Agreement - I'd be interested to know what you mean by "bad science". I know there are some scientists who are skeptical about Man's role in climate change, but many of them simply say that it's presently unclear how much Man is to blame for climate change. Which is a fair point - at least to my untutored opinion - but to me that doesn't constitute conclusive evidence that the Kyoto inititive is a waste of time.


Kyoto is based on the idea that humans are destroying the planet and irreversibly changing its climate. The reason I call this "bad science" is because it's currently unclear how much, if any, humans are affecting earth's climate. To suggest that drastic measures (that are nothing but destructive to the economies of modern industrialized nations) should be taken based on something that most of the scientific community isn't even sure is happening is a bad idea.

My own idea of climate change is one of caution, but not alarm. There are more pressing issues that could be more easily dealt with (Malaria and/or AIDS in Africa, the rise of extremism, etc..)

_________________
If you can't fix it with a hammer, you have an electrical problem.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 21, 2007 3:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 10:46 pm
Posts: 993
Location: In the Palace of No Wai, sipping PWN JOO Chai
StrongRad wrote:
Kyoto is based on the idea that humans are destroying the planet and irreversibly changing its climate. The reason I call this "bad science" is because it's currently unclear how much, if any, humans are affecting earth's climate. To suggest that drastic measures (that are nothing but destructive to the economies of modern industrialized nations) should be taken based on something that most of the scientific community isn't even sure is happening is a bad idea.


But all Kyoto specifies is that developed countries have to reduce their emissions by 5% from 1990. And developing countries don't have the same obligation to reduce emissions, but just to submit a report on how much emissions they produce. That doesn't sound drastic to me. A lot of countries have exceeded their targets, in fact. And while observing Kyoto is admittedly more expensive than not, I've not heard any complaints so far that it's hurt any country's economy.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 21, 2007 7:08 pm 
Offline
Pizza Pizza
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2004 4:05 pm
Posts: 10451
Location: probably the penalty box
What's Her Face wrote:
StrongRad wrote:
Kyoto is based on the idea that humans are destroying the planet and irreversibly changing its climate. The reason I call this "bad science" is because it's currently unclear how much, if any, humans are affecting earth's climate. To suggest that drastic measures (that are nothing but destructive to the economies of modern industrialized nations) should be taken based on something that most of the scientific community isn't even sure is happening is a bad idea.


But all Kyoto specifies is that developed countries have to reduce their emissions by 5% from 1990. And developing countries don't have the same obligation to reduce emissions, but just to submit a report on how much emissions they produce. That doesn't sound drastic to me. A lot of countries have exceeded their targets, in fact. And while observing Kyoto is admittedly more expensive than not, I've not heard any complaints so far that it's hurt any country's economy.


re: Economic Impacts- Fair enough. I admit, I was usually reading my meteorology or chemistry book when I was supposed to be paying attention in ECON class.

If a 5% decrease in emissions is all that's required AND it wouldn't cause any troubles economically, then I've got no problems with it.

What does trouble me is the fact that developing countries have no emissions caps. I can't help but wonder if the enforcement industrialized nations might be yet another incentive for companies to move to developing nations.
Of course, like I said, I know more about climate than I do economics.

Anyways, we're really off topic here. I would say "let's get back on topic", but I don't want to do that and make you think I'm trying to get the "last word" in.

_________________
If you can't fix it with a hammer, you have an electrical problem.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 3:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 1:31 am
Posts: 770
Location: THE OPINIONATED *bibendum*
hillary isn't all that bad, to me. well let me amend that. i don't HATE her, at least. i do not like her stance on video games. it drives me nuts. i don't like the idea that she knows what is right for me, although admittedly, if she blocked sale of games to minors, it wouldnt affect me at all.

i wholeheartedly support kyoto, but we'll leave that one hanging because it's the stuff of other threads, so i'm glad that hillary would support that.

really, though, if she is in the primaries, i'm never voting for her. if it's down to a 2 candidate situation, i'd consider it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 11:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 3:10 pm
Posts: 3999
Location: Sims 2
StrongRad wrote:
So, his middle name is Hussein. Who cares?


Woah. I Wiki'd that and that's just irony beyond irony. ;)

Anyway, if Obama does get to the "finals", as I call it, I'll see if his opponent seems good or not. Then, if I decide that Obama should win, then I'll wish I can turn 18 in 2 hours. :mrgreen:

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 1:55 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 2:30 pm
Posts: 17
I dunno... old people might misread his name as OSAMA. :senor: He'll probably win anyway.

_________________
Image


Last edited by Mr. Sir on Sun Apr 29, 2007 4:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 2:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 10:12 pm
Posts: 1203
Location: In Denial. LOLcation: G3G' ttfn1!
I really hopes he wins. But I know there's no way it will happen (don't know if he'll even pass the primaries).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 3:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 11:17 pm
Posts: 1670
Location: Texas, U.S.A.
Code J wrote:
I really hopes he wins. But I know there's no way it will happen (don't know if he'll even pass the primaries).


What makes you so sure that he can't win?

_________________
The meaning of life is 'bucket.'

FOR PONY!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 12:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:22 am
Posts: 5894
Location: SIBHoDC
I like Barack Obama, but as much as it pains me to say it, I think he might just be the Antichrist.

Think about it. He comes from nowhere, becomes immensely popular in a very short time, and now is poised to take control of the most powerful country in the world.

Plus his middle name is Hussein.

[/joke part of post]

No, I think he's a decent guy. I don't think he could win, and I think there are more qualified and better candidates out there (Al Gore, anyone?) but he's better than most Republicans. Except Chuck Hagel. I like Chuck Hagel.

_________________
beep beep I'm a Jeep


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 12:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 3:10 am
Posts: 14278
Location: Behind Blue Eyes
Speaking of Republicans, have you noticed that all of the good Candidates are not Evangelicals. I sense a changing in the wind. It looks like the Republicans are going back to the start.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 12:41 am 
Offline
Pizza Pizza
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2004 4:05 pm
Posts: 10451
Location: probably the penalty box
Beyond the Grave wrote:
Speaking of Republicans, have you noticed that all of the good Candidates are not Evangelicals. I sense a changing in the wind. It looks like the Republicans are going back to the start.

I haven't seen a true evangelical repub in a while.
Bush is certainly not an evangelical.

I'm just hoping to all things holy that Giuliani doesn't get the republican nomination. He'll get CREAMED in the November 08 election if he does. He is running on his name, and that's bound to come out in the general election if it doesn't get out in the primary.

To be honest, I'd vote for Hillary Clinton over Giuliani. Granted, I really don't agree with some of her stuff, but at least she has SOME experience.

_________________
If you can't fix it with a hammer, you have an electrical problem.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 12:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 10:46 pm
Posts: 993
Location: In the Palace of No Wai, sipping PWN JOO Chai
StrongRad wrote:
I haven't seen a true evangelical repub in a while.
Bush is certainly not an evangelical.


Huh, I'd say personally that he's primo evangelical. Certainly that "God made me invade Iraq" stuff was skirting close to it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 12:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 2:14 pm
Posts: 8899
Location: looking at my post and/or profile
I dislike presidential dynasties. A lot. If another Bush even considers running I think I'll go into a spasm.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 12:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2004 4:11 am
Posts: 18942
Location: Sitting in an English garden, waiting for the sun
JohnTheTinyCowboy wrote:
He comes from nowhere, becomes immensely popular in a very short time, and now is poised to take control of the most powerful country in the world.
So did Lincoln. And Obama's trying to use that similarity to win.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 1:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 1:51 am
Posts: 730
Location: Building a birdhouse in your soul.
My only stance on Obama is that he is only been on the Senate for 2 years, so I dont know if I could vote for him.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 1:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 1:33 am
Posts: 14288
Location: Wouldn't you like to know?
firemarc924 wrote:
My only stance on Obama is that he is only been on the Senate for 2 years, so I dont know if I could vote for him.
There have been Presidents that has had little experience. Look at Lincoln.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 1:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:22 am
Posts: 5894
Location: SIBHoDC
IantheGecko wrote:
JohnTheTinyCowboy wrote:
He comes from nowhere, becomes immensely popular in a very short time, and now is poised to take control of the most powerful country in the world.
So did Lincoln. And Obama's trying to use that similarity to win.


And they're both from Illinois!

Coincidence...? I think not.

No, seriously, I think Obama would make a decent president, but sadly, I think many Americans would not trust a man whose name sounds like "Iraq Hussein Osama" to be their president, no matter how great he'd be.

VP, maybe. Gore-Obama '08!

_________________
beep beep I'm a Jeep


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 1:45 am 
Offline
Pizza Pizza
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2004 4:05 pm
Posts: 10451
Location: probably the penalty box
JohnTheTinyCowboy wrote:


VP, maybe. Gore-Obama '08!

EWWWwwwww...

Now THAT is a ticket I'd NEVER vote for.

Clinton-Obama would be great, especially if the "Clinton" was Bill. Unfortunately, that can't happen. :-(
I like Bill.

_________________
If you can't fix it with a hammer, you have an electrical problem.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 5:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 10:12 pm
Posts: 1203
Location: In Denial. LOLcation: G3G' ttfn1!
StrongRad wrote:
I like Bill.


Don't we all, Sree, don't we all...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 5:18 am 
Offline
Pizza Pizza
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2004 4:05 pm
Posts: 10451
Location: probably the penalty box
Code J wrote:
StrongRad wrote:
I like Bill.


Don't we all, Sree, don't we all...

Hey, I'd go to the Arkansas-Tennessee football game with him anytime.

Bill, if you're reading this, holla at ya boy!
Image Image Image

_________________
If you can't fix it with a hammer, you have an electrical problem.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 3:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 12:33 am
Posts: 1661
Location: About 260 miles northeast of Stu's backyard.
Quote:
Huh, I'd say personally that he's primo evangelical. Certainly that "God made me invade Iraq" stuff was skirting close to it.


Link?

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 3:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 11:17 pm
Posts: 1670
Location: Texas, U.S.A.
lahimatoa wrote:
Quote:
Huh, I'd say personally that he's primo evangelical. Certainly that "God made me invade Iraq" stuff was skirting close to it.


Link?


http://news.independent.co.uk/world/ame ... 317805.ece

_________________
The meaning of life is 'bucket.'

FOR PONY!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 3:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 12:33 am
Posts: 1661
Location: About 260 miles northeast of Stu's backyard.
Not exactly iron-clad proof he said that, but whatever.

Thanks.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 3:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2006 3:06 am
Posts: 2049
Location: Standing on Watterson's front lawn
I don't agree with a good handful of Obama's positions, but think of it this way: President Barack Obama would have the coolest sounding name since President Calvin Coolidge.

_________________
ATTN: LOWER BOARD USERS HAVE MOVED TO ANOTHER FORUM. COME JOIN THE FUN!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 3:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 11:17 pm
Posts: 1670
Location: Texas, U.S.A.
lahimatoa wrote:
Not exactly iron-clad proof he said that, but whatever.

Thanks.


I guess it's easy to dismiss any journalism as not being iron-clad proof when it says something you don't want to hear.

_________________
The meaning of life is 'bucket.'

FOR PONY!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 3:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 12:33 am
Posts: 1661
Location: About 260 miles northeast of Stu's backyard.
Quote:
I guess it's easy to dismiss any journalism as not being iron-clad proof when it says something you don't want to hear.


And it's also easy to accept any journalism as being iron-clad true when it says something you want to hear.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 4:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 10:46 pm
Posts: 993
Location: In the Palace of No Wai, sipping PWN JOO Chai
Um yeah...... I'm just going to invoke Occam's Razor at this stage. And the simplest explanation is that he actually said it, rather than some mad conspiracy concocted by Abu Mazen and/or the BBC.

No one from Bush's camp has disputed Mazen's claim anyway, as far as I'm aware, and he's told other people that he's guided by God (see PMG's link).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 4:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 12:33 am
Posts: 1661
Location: About 260 miles northeast of Stu's backyard.
Major difference between

"God told me to invade Iraq and kill the Satan-worshiping Muslims!"

and

"I pray for direction from God in my life and work."

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 5:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 10:46 pm
Posts: 993
Location: In the Palace of No Wai, sipping PWN JOO Chai
Well, yeah, it is. Anyway - this is what he said, according to Nabil Shaath:

Quote:
President Bush said to all of us: 'I'm driven with a mission from God. God would tell me, "George, go and fight those terrorists in Afghanistan." And I did, and then God would tell me, "George, go and end the tyranny in Iraq …" And I did. And now, again, I feel God's words coming to me, "Go get the Palestinians their state and get the Israelis their security, and get peace in the Middle East." And by God I'm gonna do it.


>>>link>>>

You can take it or leave it.[/quote]


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 67 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group