This is one of the strangest things I've ever read:
http://www.debito.org/index.php/?p=240
I haven't read the whole thing, but the gist of it is this:
Bunmei Ibuki wrote:
However nutritious butter is, if one eats only butter every day, one acquires metabolic syndrome. Human rights are important. But if they are respected too much, Japanese society will end up with human rights metabolic syndrome.
Bunmei Ibuki is Japan's Minister of Education, meaning he's in charge of the Ministry of Education (actually the "Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology"), which controls the entire educational process.
Now for some additional context, from somebody's response:
Matt Dioguardi wrote:
Ibuki makes comments that show on a fundamental basis he
misunderstands constitutional government.
He seems to view rights as entitlements sort of handed out by the
government. However, these rights can be overemphasized and to the
detriment of the minzoku.
Minzoku translates as folk, but it’s code words for *race*, as in
Yamato Minzoku.
Ibuki’s opinion is that rights should not be overemphasized at the
expense of the minzoku. And he explicitly identifies the Yamato Minzoku.
This is the *same* minzoku that so many Japanese lost their lives
over during WWII.
This is sort of like saying, yes, it’s nice to have rights, but don’t
forget that the heart and soul of Japan is the Yamato minzoku, our
homogenous race heritage.
My own comments:
It's worth noting that Japan has less human rights enforcement than the United States and many other countries, so I'm wondering kind of excess it is that Mr. Ibuki fears. Also, human rights is an issue for foreigners in Japan, including those who become Japanese citizens, than for the native people. For example, it's rare that there is open racial discrimination in Japan, but when it
does happen, it's almost impossible to do anything about it. Given that rights are an issue for minorities in Japan, combined wit Mr. Ibuki's other comments, it's quite possible that Mr. Ibuki is being almost openly racist here.
Anyway... an excess of human rights? Aren't rights supposed to be non-negotiable? Rights are supposed to be something everybody has; that's why they're called rights. Excess + rights = does not compute.
Don't get me wrong: I don't hate Japan. I wouldn't go so far as to say I love Japan; I've never been there and I don't know what it's really like, and it's not the sort of country that you can really get a good picture of by watching a lot of Japanese media; you have to go there. But I think Japan does have some issues that need to be fixed.
Thoughts?
- Kef