Didymus wrote:
In essence, that is what is meant by Romans 1: mankind basically saying, "Who needs you, God?" and then being left with the consequences of a world from which God is deliberately absent?
Why does today's mankind have to pay for the sins of yesterday's mankind? None of us were around in the time of Romans 1. None of their choices regarding God has anything to do with people living today. And anyone born during the time of God's absence is given a severe disadvantage because all they have to rely on is the word of other humans in regards to the nature of God. And we can all agree that humans are very flawed.
My belief when it comes to this: The idea that the sins of the father become the sins of his children, seems like the backwards kind of stuff typical of these ancient times, and so the God that came out of those times is reflective of that. Adam and Eve eat forbidden fruit. God doesn't just punish them, but all who came after them.
I'm sorry if I'm coming off as judgmental towards your beliefs. I am far far more open minded than I am sounding in these posts. I just believe it is necessary to question things if I hope to gain any understanding them
I also realize that I've taken this thread way off topic. So under the assumption that there is a God, I would like to answer the question, "What if there was NO God?"
. . . Assuming that humans exist, I think we would have been, in our primitive states, completely unable to explain just about everything that goes on around us in nature. The movements of the sun, stars, and moon would seem like magic to us. We would wonder why are some growing seasons so good for the crops, and others are so terrible. We would wonder why that tribe over there looks and behaves different from our tribe. And I think, most importantly, death would scare us to death

. And we would have to create something supernatural to explain all these things, to keep ourselves from going crazy. Something must control all these things, and the something we come up with would probably reflect the questions we need answered, and the values we have. Very slowly, we would learn more about how the world works, and our supernatural something would adapt to our understandings. So we learn the stars aren't actually the eyes of our dead ancestors watching us sleep at night, and doing a silly little dance isn't going to make it rain. But we will always need the supernatural something to be waiting for us when we die, because no matter how much we learn about the natural world around us, death will always scare us to death.
edit: didymus, I just now noticed all the things you wrote under the----------------- at the bottom of your post. I agree, you answered the question according to the rules presented by the original poster, and for some strange reason that wasn't good enough. I thought it was a perfectly valid answer given the question.
As for you challenge, to be honest, I'm not sure I am prepared at this time to accept it. I will keep it in mind as I ponder God and religion over the next few days/weeks/whatever, and hopefully answer it with some confidence. And no, I'm not going to try to come up with some answer to disprove the Bible or anything like that. That's really not my goal at all, even if these last couple posts indicate otherwise.