| Homestar Runner Wiki Forum http://forum.hrwiki.org/ |
|
| Should Bush be impeached? http://forum.hrwiki.org/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=11868 |
Page 2 of 5 |
| Author: | Wesstarrunner [ Sat Jul 14, 2007 1:35 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Sometimes I like to point out the painfully obvious... |
|
| Author: | WierdAlFan [ Mon Aug 06, 2007 1:27 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
honestly i dont think he should. and if he was, and they pulled all the troops from iraq, the insurgency would increase, because the iraqui police force would be wiped out sooo fast. then what? terror attacks? probably. and just think about it, troops will probably never fully withdraw from Iraq. we still have troops in Korea and Vietnam. |
|
| Author: | Didymus [ Mon Aug 06, 2007 3:59 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Actually, I'm pretty sure we pulled out of Viet Nam completely in the 1970's. But we do still have troops in Korea. In fact, what most people don't know is that the war in Korea never officially ended; we've just been on armistice for the past 50 years or so. |
|
| Author: | bwave [ Mon Aug 06, 2007 4:31 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Didymus wrote: the war in Korea never officially ended; we've just been on armistice for the past 50 years or so.
I'm working on it. |
|
| Author: | CaptainPastHisPrime [ Mon Aug 13, 2007 11:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Definitely impeach Bush. He calls himself the President of the U.S.? Why, he's nothing but a menace to society. He doesn't care about people, all he cares about is hoarding money. |
|
| Author: | The Noid [ Mon Aug 13, 2007 11:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
This isn't the thread for conspiracy theories. |
|
| Author: | furrykef [ Mon Aug 13, 2007 11:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
*blink* where was a conspiracy theory mentioned? |
|
| Author: | The Noid [ Mon Aug 13, 2007 11:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Bush being a gigantic money monger could probably be called one. |
|
| Author: | Askingforachallenge [ Mon Aug 13, 2007 11:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
well... he sure aint the best president, and the only reason we voted for him these two terms is because first, we thought gore was power hungry or something, and second, nobody supported gay marriage. so.. i voted yes. |
|
| Author: | Didymus [ Mon Aug 13, 2007 11:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
You may be misunderstanding the whole point of Impeachment, there, Asking. You can't impeach someone just because you don't agree with their policies, or even if they make mistakes in office. Impeachment is essentially a criminal trial. If the man cannot be convicted of an actual crime, then impeachment procedures cannot take place. |
|
| Author: | IantheGecko [ Mon Aug 13, 2007 11:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
But lots of presidents weren't really the "best". Warren Harding himself said he was unfit for the office and never should have run; his presidency was plagued with scandal and corruption. Harding ended up dying of a heart attack about two years into his term, but he wasn't impeached. |
|
| Author: | Beyond the Grave [ Mon Aug 13, 2007 11:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I don't think Bush should be impeached. He is too far along and it's not worth the red tape. He is into the lame duck phase of his presidency. January 20, 2009 can't come fast enough for me. |
|
| Author: | StrongRad [ Tue Aug 14, 2007 12:31 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Beyond the Grave wrote: He is into the lame duck
No he's not... According to him, he'll never be a lame duck unless he goes hunting with Chaney. |
|
| Author: | Didymus [ Tue Aug 14, 2007 12:41 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
But that wouldn't make him a lame duck! A dead deer, maybe, but not a lame duck. |
|
| Author: | Beyond the Grave [ Tue Aug 14, 2007 12:55 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Didymus wrote: But that wouldn't make him a lame duck! A dead deer, maybe, but not a lame duck. No, he'd be a quail.
|
|
| Author: | PianoManGidley [ Tue Aug 14, 2007 2:58 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Beyond the Grave wrote: Didymus wrote: But that wouldn't make him a lame duck! A dead deer, maybe, but not a lame duck. No, he'd be a quail.Wait, why is Dan Quayle coming back? |
|
| Author: | Beyond the Grave [ Tue Aug 14, 2007 5:08 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
PianoManGidley wrote: Wait, why is Dan Quayle coming back? He finally learned how to spell potato.
|
|
| Author: | CaptainPastHisPrime [ Sat Sep 29, 2007 12:48 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Didymus wrote: But that wouldn't make him a lame duck! A dead deer, maybe, but not a lame duck.
It would, however, make him just plain lame. |
|
| Author: | Vitruvian Dude [ Sat Sep 29, 2007 12:53 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
CaptainPastHisPrime wrote: Definitely impeach Bush. He calls himself the President of the U.S.? Why, he's nothing but a menace to society. He doesn't care about people, all he cares about is hoarding money.
Well you see, when a presidential candidate receives a majority of the electoral votes, they then become the President. And so, that's why he calls himself the President of the U.S. Because, you know, he is. |
|
| Author: | CaptainPastHisPrime [ Sat Sep 29, 2007 12:55 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Vitruvian Dude wrote: CaptainPastHisPrime wrote: Definitely impeach Bush. He calls himself the President of the U.S.? Why, he's nothing but a menace to society. He doesn't care about people, all he cares about is hoarding money. Well you see, when a presidential candidate receives a majority of the electoral votes, they then become the President. And so, that's why he calls himself the President of the U.S. Because, you know, he is. I guess you're right, but in hindsight, I don't think he should've won after all. |
|
| Author: | Wesstarrunner [ Sat Sep 29, 2007 3:36 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
If he pronounces "nuclear" right I think nearly everyone who opposes him will stop. Then they will gladly support his unconstitutional laws such as the Patriot Act. He seriously isn't worth it, if you let him go out peacefully nobody will remember him anyhow. |
|
| Author: | IantheGecko [ Sat Sep 29, 2007 3:40 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Dude, Bush didn't create the USA PATRIOT ACT; Congressman Jim Sensenbrenner did. Bush just signed it into law. And I think it's kinda hard for everyone to forgive him if he learns how to pronounce one adjective correctly.
|
|
| Author: | Wesstarrunner [ Sat Sep 29, 2007 4:14 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
It said they did on Uncyclopedia, and everyone knows that all tall tales on Uncyclopedia have a grain of truth. And if it wasn't for Bush the Patriot Act wouldn't be in law. He supported it, so he's a bad dude. It's too late in his term to impeach him though, just be a waste of resources. |
|
| Author: | IantheGecko [ Sat Sep 29, 2007 4:19 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Wesstarrunner wrote: It said they did on Uncyclopedia There's your problem.
|
|
| Author: | StrongRad [ Sat Sep 29, 2007 4:21 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Wesstarrunner wrote: It said they did on Uncyclopedia, and everyone knows that all tall tales on Uncyclopedia have a grain of truth.
And if it wasn't for Bush the Patriot Act wouldn't be in law. He supported it, so he's a bad dude. It's too late in his term to impeach him though, just be a waste of resources. He did it alone. Without ANYONE voting on it at all... Riiiiiiiight. Why don't you look at who voted for it. 2 Senators (and one was NOT Hilary Clinton) did not vote for it (and one of them didn't vote either way). The vote was slightly more nay in the House, with 66 nay votes, compared to 357 yea voted. Senate House The whole "Bush is behind this" argument is tired and doesn't hold water. |
|
| Author: | Vitruvian Dude [ Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:10 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
America says, "We actually know the president's name, so we'll blame him for everything." |
|
| Author: | The Noid [ Sat Sep 29, 2007 11:36 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Wesstarrunner wrote: It said they did on Uncyclopedia, and everyone knows that all tall tales on Uncyclopedia have a grain of truth.
On Uncyclopedia I made a page stating that Frankenberry was made out of several body parts of dead, pink dudes. So a cereal mascot is made out of dead pink dudes? Yeahsure. |
|
| Author: | HHFOV [ Sat Sep 29, 2007 1:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
And bravely and swiftly the sarcasm eluded Noidyman's senses. I completely agree with Vitruvian; actually, Bush has a higher approval rating than Congress, made up of mostly democrats, so Bush and Co. can't be blamed as much. Also Bush didn't actually do anything but someone will probably convict him for jaywalking or something so what's the point amirite. |
|
| Author: | The Noid [ Sat Sep 29, 2007 2:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Eh, it's early. I should go sleep some more before I step onto Internetland. |
|
| Author: | iand93 [ Sat Sep 29, 2007 3:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
He shouldn't be impeached. He only has *checks T-Minus W* 479 days, 56 minutes, and 37 seconds left in office. It would just be a waste o' time. |
|
| Page 2 of 5 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|