But I bet you that NH is all that Hillary's gonna get.

What annoys me about Huckabee is that he's pulling the same crap that Bush did eight years ago: trying to be a "simple livin' country folk southerner" who doesn't get caught up in too much, you know, "politics" or any sort of serious business and just has the casual hard-working American interests at heart.

And people are buying into that rhetoric again.

*headdesk*

What annoys me about Huckabee is that he's pulling the same crap that Bush did eight years ago: trying to be a "simple livin' country folk southerner" who doesn't get caught up in too much, you know, "politics" or any sort of serious business and just has the casual hard-working American interests at heart.

And people are buying into that rhetoric again.

*headdesk*

Huckabee is just a repeat of 2000: that real nice Southern guy you'd just like to chill with is way better than that silly old Democrat blabbering about issues like "alternative energy" and "prison reform."

I really can't believe NY would bite on "I'm experienced because I lived in the White House" and "I was mayor during 9/11! 9/11!!!!!!!!!!".

Probably because she never dumped Bill after that whole fiasco. If she did I'd like her a bit more.

So do you still dislike her even after she showed how much character she had?

[Devils advocate]Is this the same character she had in so courageously attacking Barrack Obama for his drug use that occurred 20+ years ago through her campaign staff?[/DA]

Mud slinging - gotta hate it.

Second she wants to give everyone medical aid(or something like that) which isn't bad but she's doing it with OUR money and some people (I'm not taliking about people who are disabled and can't do anything) can actually get a job and work for it but if she goes into office then th9ose people will be like "oh I don't have to pay for this medical plan because someone else is paying for me!" and then we would be working our but off trying to PAY for taxes that will PAY THEM!!!

Third look who her husband is!!

One reason, she is pro-choise!

I am going to state this as clearly as I can: Everything that our government pays for comes from our money.

So because she is married to one of the best presidents we have had in the last 50 years, you don't like her. Am I understanding that correctly?

Sooo...you would rather have had her end her marriage which would look very bad and could have potentially ended any political aspirations she might have had than keep her family together which shows a strong bond and a is extremely beneficial to her political career? Heck it puts ahead of the majority of the Republican candidates because she kept her marriage together and their marital problem wasn't irreconcilable differences it was adultery the most egregious of all marital sins. So do you still dislike her even after she showed how much character she had?

It would mean the sequence of presidents would go something like this (counting separate terms)-Bush, Clinton, Clinton, Bush, Bush, Clinton. So, over 20 years and only two last names. And not even by happy coincidence. That's fairly depressing, isn't it?

Um, yeah, I think that was the whole problem Angelgrl was objecting to. Angelgrl was saying that the government, and therefore we, shouldn't pay for it at all. (I don't think I agree with that, though. I'm just pointing out that nothing Angelgrl said suggested that we don't pay for what the government pays for.)

I would hardly classify Bill as one of the best presidents in the past 50 years. Perhaps if he and Nixon where the only ones in the comparison...