Homestar Runner Wiki Forum

A companion to the Homestar Runner Wiki
It is currently Tue Oct 03, 2023 1:14 am

All times are UTC




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 387 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 13  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Are all Non-christians Going to Hell?
PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 2:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:10 pm
Posts: 208
Location: Somewhere, TM
I recently read an essay saying that only 30% of the world is Christian.

Assuming that there is a Christian afterlife, is 70% (apx. 3.5 billion) of the world going to Hell? Also remember the animal issue and that some Christians aren't good people, which can only escalate the hellions.

So, what do you think?

_________________
Image
171st POST ANNIVERSARY!!!


Last edited by Ricksea on Wed Apr 06, 2005 6:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ding! Dong! The Witch is Dead!
PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 2:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 15, 2004 12:07 am
Posts: 414
Location: Middlesbrough, UK
Ricksea wrote:
I recently read an essay saying that only 30% of the world is Christian.

Assuming that there is a Christian afterlife, is 70% (apx. 3.5 billion) of the world going to Hell? Also remember the animal issue and that some Christians aren't good people, which can only escalate the hellions.

So, what do you think?


Well, that article has been reviewed on Snopes, and many of the things are inaccurate, but the Christian thing is almost correct, with 33% of the world Christian (not 30).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 2:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:10 pm
Posts: 208
Location: Somewhere, TM
Alright, forget about the article. (It was on my math teacher's door.) That's still a lot of people going to Hell.

_________________
Image
171st POST ANNIVERSARY!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 2:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 6:05 am
Posts: 5636
Location: swirlee.org for great justice
Um.. I'd like to know what the title of this thread has to do with the topic of discussion.

_________________
StrongCanada wrote:
Jordan, you are THE SUCK at kissing! YAY! Just thought you should know! Rainbows! Sunshine!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Nothing
PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 3:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:10 pm
Posts: 208
Location: Somewhere, TM
InterruptorJones wrote:
Um.. I'd like to know what the title of this thread has to do with the topic of discussion.


This topic has to do with going to Hell, and, "Ding! Dong! The Witch is Dead!" from "The Wizard of Oz" was the proclomation that the munchkins sang announcing that the Wicked Witch of the East was in Hell.

You could also relate that sixteen so-called "witches" were unlawfully hanged in 1692, while this topic could connect to unlawful hell sentencing. "Ding! Dong!" could represent the bells of the Catholic Church, that strongly believes in Hell. There are many exclamation points in Hell as in the title of this post.

You could have a whole thread dedicated to disecting meaning out of the title of this post. I'm shocked that YOU, INTERRUPTOR JONES could not find one simple meaning out of the title of my post? You could have added to the discussion I started instead of tweaking at technicalities, but NOOOOOOOOOOOO, YOU complained, as always.
I'm just kidding, IJ.

Now, will someone PLEASE respond meaningfully?

_________________
Image
171st POST ANNIVERSARY!!!


Last edited by Ricksea on Wed Apr 06, 2005 6:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 4:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 09, 2004 5:21 am
Posts: 2140
Location: My Backyard
someone's looking for a banning :)

The point IJ was trying to make (I am guessing here) is that the topic to a post needs to be relevant to what is being posted. Forcing the users to guess as to what this post is about is hardly relevant.

As you pointed out in your response to Jones, one could interprete the meaning to many different concepts... none of which have anything to do with non-christians going to hell (without stretching a little).

So before you go off on any of the mods, make sure that you are on solid ground with the argument you are making. I personally take IJ's side here (and it has nothing to do with him being a mod).

As for the topic:

I don't believe that all of the non-christians will be going to hell. I also don't believe that children who die before being baptized will go to hell. I believe in an age of accountability (so... children, being under the age, are exempt)

I feel that everyone will eventually have a chance to learn what is true (whatever that may be, I am not claiming that I know what it is). If they accept what is true, then they will go to "heaven". If after being given the option to accept it or not, and they still deny it, then they may be in some trouble.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 4:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 1:33 am
Posts: 14288
Location: Wouldn't you like to know?
Well, if that is true, then you are right, Hell is filled with a lot of souls. But personally, I don't think it's like that. But think of this,
Didymus wrote:
The Council of Trent basically declared that anyone who believes in Protestant doctrine and/or are not in communion with the Roman Church are heretics and damned to hell. Now I understand that Vatican II tried to correct some of that error, but it left the original document of the COT in place, meaning that, when you get right down to it, we Protestants are still heretics in the eyes of the Roman Church.
The council of Trent was a Catholic meeting a while back. So now, which version of chistianity is right? Protestant or Catholic?

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nothing
PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 6:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:10 pm
Posts: 208
Location: Somewhere, TM
Ricksea wrote:
InterruptorJones wrote:
Um.. I'd like to know what the title of this thread has to do with the topic of discussion.


This topic has to do with going to Hell, and, "Ding! Dong! The Witch is Dead!" from "The Wizard of Oz" was the proclomation that the munchkins sang announcing that the Wicked Witch of the East was in Hell.

You could also relate that sixteen so-called "witches" were unlawfully hanged in 1692, while this topic could connect to unlawful hell sentencing. "Ding! Dong!" could represent the bells of the Catholic Church, that strongly believes in Hell. There are many exclamation points in Hell as in the title of this post.

You could have a whole thread dedicated to disecting meaning out of the title of this post. I'm shocked that YOU, INTERRUPTOR JONES could not find one simple meaning out of the title of my post? You could have added to the discussion I started instead of tweaking at technicalities, but NOOOOOOOOOOOO, YOU complained, as always.
I'm just kidding, IJ.

Now, will someone PLEASE respond meaningfully?


Now that I've enlarged the very small writing, you can see that this post was just a joke; a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to catch IJ in the act of making an (in my opinion) unjust post. Please don't ban me. I've really tried to be a good poster and I'm almost up to 100 posts. If you hate this title so much I'll change it to "Are all non-christians going to Hell?".

_________________
Image
171st POST ANNIVERSARY!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 7:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 3:10 am
Posts: 14278
Location: Behind Blue Eyes
ramrod wrote:
Well, if that is true, then you are right, Hell is filled with a lot of souls. But personally, I don't think it's like that. But think of this,
Didymus wrote:
The Council of Trent basically declared that anyone who believes in Protestant doctrine and/or are not in communion with the Roman Church are heretics and damned to hell. Now I understand that Vatican II tried to correct some of that error, but it left the original document of the COT in place, meaning that, when you get right down to it, we Protestants are still heretics in the eyes of the Roman Church.
The council of Trent was a Catholic meeting a while back. So now, which version of chistianity is right? Protestant or Catholic?


They are all the same. There is no real difference. They all believe that Jesus Christ is the lord and savior.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 10:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:06 am
Posts: 1809
Location: lol.
Then of course you have the other Abrahamic religions: Islam and Judaism...

And the Universal Church of Google.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 12:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 1:33 am
Posts: 14288
Location: Wouldn't you like to know?
Beyond the Grave wrote:
ramrod wrote:
Well, if that is true, then you are right, Hell is filled with a lot of souls. But personally, I don't think it's like that. But think of this,
Didymus wrote:
The Council of Trent basically declared that anyone who believes in Protestant doctrine and/or are not in communion with the Roman Church are heretics and damned to hell. Now I understand that Vatican II tried to correct some of that error, but it left the original document of the COT in place, meaning that, when you get right down to it, we Protestants are still heretics in the eyes of the Roman Church.
The council of Trent was a Catholic meeting a while back. So now, which version of chistianity is right? Protestant or Catholic?


They are all the same. There is no real difference. They all believe that Jesus Christ is the lord and savior.
You're right to a point. Catholics like myself blief that when you recieve the eucharist you are actually earing the body and you are actually the blodd of Christ. Protestants believe that the bread and wine are just symbolic.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 1:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 5:21 pm
Posts: 15581
Location: Hey! I'm looking for some kind of trangly thing!
ramrod wrote:
You're right to a point. Catholics like myself blief that when you recieve the eucharist you are actually earing the body and you are actually the blodd of Christ. Protestants believe that the bread and wine are just symbolic.

Not all Protestants. We Lutherans believe in the True Presence as taught by the Scriptures, but the Baptist church in which I grew up doesn't.

Frankly, at the risk of sounding religiously arrogant, I think we Lutherans combine the best elements of both the Protestant and Catholic traditions.

But back to the topic at hand:

Before I answer that, I would like to point out that behind this question (who's going to hell and who isn't) is an even more fundamental question: Does Jesus Save? Did he indeed accomplish on the cross what the Bible says he accomplished--forgiveness of mankind's sins, reconciliation with God, new life in his resurrection? That, I think, is the question that needs to be asked.

_________________
ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 12:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 3:10 am
Posts: 14278
Location: Behind Blue Eyes
Didymus wrote:
Frankly, at the risk of sounding religiously arrogant, I think we Lutherans combine the best elements of both the Protestant and Catholic traditions.


That's because Lutherans were the first Protestant sect. Lutherans and the Anglican Church were basically Cathoilcs who didn't go along with the pope.
I know the Anglican Church (up until the Puritans took over) was identical to the Catholic Church.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 1:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 09, 2004 5:21 am
Posts: 2140
Location: My Backyard
Didymus wrote:
Frankly, at the risk of sounding religiously arrogant, I think we Lutherans combine the best elements of both the Protestant and Catholic traditions.


It may come off sounded arrogant, but shouldn't that be part of a true religious conviction? Of course you are going to believe that you have the best parts of several religions.

But you can't really expect someone devoted to either of those other religions (Catholic and Protestant in this case) to agree with you. Right? :)

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nothing
PostPosted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 1:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 09, 2004 5:21 am
Posts: 2140
Location: My Backyard
Ricksea wrote:
Now that I've enlarged the very small writing, you can see that this post was just a joke; a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to catch IJ in the act of making an (in my opinion) unjust post. Please don't ban me. I've really tried to be a good poster and I'm almost up to 100 posts. If you hate this title so much I'll change it to "Are all non-christians going to Hell?".


Don't worry, I won't be banning you. I tried to say that in jest as well. It is just difficult to convey our true meanings when all you have is what you know about me from my previous posts (next to nothing I would assume) and some random smiley-face pictures :eek:

Personally I don't really care if you make posts with obscure titles in the off-topic forum. But we try to keep things somewhat organized down here in the religious/political discussion area.

So this was (in my opinion) a decent topic, worth debating for sure. I just wanted to make sure that it got looked at for the right reasons :)

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 2:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 15, 2004 12:07 am
Posts: 414
Location: Middlesbrough, UK
I believe that as long as you are a good person, you will go to heaven (if there really is a heaven, anyway), no matter what religion (as long as that religion doesn't harm anyone). Of course, I'm only saying this if we assume that a heaven exists.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Let me get this straight...
PostPosted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 2:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:10 pm
Posts: 208
Location: Somewhere, TM
Let me get this straight; the standard Christian belief is that if you accept what is right (for the purpose of argument, that Jesus Christ is the savior and there is one God) you'll go to heaven. Otherwise, you'll go to Hell.

This doesn't make sense to me; isn't being a good person more important than accepting "the truth"? For example, if an athiest gives great amounts of charity, never commits crimes, and is good to him or herself and other people, will he or she still go to Hell for not accepting "the word of God"?

This is the point of the thread: just under 70% of all people do not accept the Christian word of God, whether they know of Christianity or not, although most are good people. After fifteen posts no one has really started to answer my question from a Christian point of view. Please do.

_________________
Image
171st POST ANNIVERSARY!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 2:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 09, 2004 5:21 am
Posts: 2140
Location: My Backyard
I am more under the impression that "doing good things" is exactly what God wishes for us to do. There are other more important "religious" things that need to be done, but I feel that if you are living a life worthy to enter heaven you will be willing to accept whatever truth is beyond the grave.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 3:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 1:33 am
Posts: 14288
Location: Wouldn't you like to know?
Jesus came to Earth to save everyone, not just the ones that follow him. He knew that there would be those that won't believe, but he still set out to save everyone. If you are a good person, and don't commit heinous sins, that you are going to Heaven. Or at least that's the way I see it.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 7:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2004 9:27 pm
Posts: 1032
Location: Texas
^No one doesn't sin.

Just check out my posts here for my opinion.

It's not about being a "good" person, but rather having faith in God and a relationship with him. That's his will: To be with and have a relationship with you.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 7:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 1:33 am
Posts: 14288
Location: Wouldn't you like to know?
I'm not saying that we are all sinless, but as long as we don't do relly heinous sins, like kill someone, and if you try to help othere, then you will be rewarded.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 9:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 3:10 am
Posts: 14278
Location: Behind Blue Eyes
we are born sinners. You know it's a little thing called origninal{SP} sin

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 9:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2004 9:27 pm
Posts: 1032
Location: Texas
Yeah, it even says what it takes to go to heaven in the Bible. Just check the ever-so-famous John 3:16!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 9:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 3:31 am
Posts: 584
Location: Cubeland
You haven't answered the question though, Jimmie Johnson. Do you think that all non-Christians are going to hell? Yes or no. It's as simple as that.

My answer: no. I just don't believe that God would say "you have to do this this and this and be part of this club for me to be bring you to heaven."

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 10:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2004 9:27 pm
Posts: 1032
Location: Texas
K, I say yes. It's the relationship you have with him, not if your "part of the club."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 12:30 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:06 am
Posts: 1809
Location: lol.
If an atheist is a better person than a Christian, then which has the greater chance of going to heaven?
Even Popes have done things in the past that, were they not the Pope, would have been thought of as nearly blasphemous. People have tortured and killed others in the name of God. Does their belief protect them?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 12:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 3:10 am
Posts: 14278
Location: Behind Blue Eyes
If you are refering to the Spanish Inquesition(sp), the Catholic Church would like to erase that from history.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 12:37 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:06 am
Posts: 1809
Location: lol.
Beyond the Grave wrote:
If you are refering to the Spanish Inquesition(sp), the Catholic Church would like to erase that from history.


I bet they would.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 4:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 5:21 pm
Posts: 15581
Location: Hey! I'm looking for some kind of trangly thing!
Here's part of the problem, a flaw in the mathematics, if you will: no one can possibly deserve an eternity of heavenly bliss. That's the chief mistake most people make: they assume that by living average, mediocre lives (what most people call "basically good"), they are somehow entitled to God's favor. That's the fundamental flaw that many people make, including some Christians: they want to think of eternal heavenly bliss as something they deserve, and they are simply wrong.

Why, even the greatest of saints recognize this. If you were to ask St. Paul, "Do you think you deserve an eternity of heavenly bliss?" his answer would be (and in fact he's already said this in Ephesians 2:8-10), "No one could possibly deserve that except Christ himself." I'll bet if you were to ask Mother Theresa, "Do you think you deserve it?" her response would most likely be, "Certainly not! In fact, I'd much rather do more work on earth just to repay the kindness of my Lord."

And in fact, despite my immense respect for her, the truth is she wouldn't. Even after all her years of faithful service to God and people, she could only actually deserve a single lifetime of bliss, not an eternity of bliss. Ninety years max.

So what does that mean for the average mediocre person who doesn't live the life of a St. Paul or a Mother Theresa (i.e., what most people call "basically good")? They couldn't possibly earn even a few years of heavenly bliss, much less a lifetime, and certainly not an eternity.

We Christians have this one simple fact straight: since no one deserves heavenly bliss, it can only be given or received as a GIFT, not a reward.

And a gift can only be received in the way that it is given. And since this gift of eternal heavenly bliss was given in the form of a crucified and risen Savior, then that is the only way it can be received. There is no other way. Jesus himself tells us there is no other way:
Quote:
Enter by the narrow gate. For the gate is wide and the way is easy that leads to destruction, and those who enter by it are many. For the gate is narrow and the way is hard that leads to life, and those who find it are few (Matthew 7:13-14).

I know this is hard for people to accept. I know it doesn't fit with the way most people view the universe and themselves ("I'm a good person. I'm entitled to heaven"), but it's the truth. Frankly, I don't like it myself. It makes me sad that there are people who will lose out on an eternity with God for no other reason than they cannot bring themselves to accept this free gift. Jesus' own words come to mind: "How I longed to gather you to me as a mother hen gathers her chicks beneath her wings. But you would not have it."

So the choice is yours: either you can accept as a free gift what God has freely offered through his own son, or you can reject this free gift and cling to the illusion that you deserve it. Humility that leads to eternal life, or arrogance that leads to death.

I will confess that this is a temptation for Christians as well. Sometimes Christians operate under the illusion that, just because they are Christians, that this means they deserve eternal life, too, on account of their good theology or their right choices. Christians, too, sometimes need to be reminded of the words of St. Paul, "You are saved by grace through faith, which is not of yourselves, but is a gift from God."

So my logic is quite simple:

1. No one can possibly deserve an eternity of heavenly bliss.
2. It can only be given and received as a free gift.
3. God gave us this gift in the form of his crucified and risen son Jesus.
4. Christians understand this and gratefully accept it.

_________________
ImageImage


Last edited by Didymus on Fri Apr 08, 2005 5:52 am, edited 3 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 4:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 15, 2004 12:07 am
Posts: 414
Location: Middlesbrough, UK
ramrod wrote:
Jesus came to Earth to save everyone, not just the ones that follow him. He knew that there would be those that won't believe, but he still set out to save everyone. If you are a good person, and don't commit heinous sins, that you are going to Heaven. Or at least that's the way I see it.


I agree with what you said. I don't go to church or anything (even though I'm catholic), but I believe as long as there is a heaven, then I'll be going there as long because I'm a good person.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 387 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 13  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group