Homestar Runner Wiki Forum

A companion to the Homestar Runner Wiki
It is currently Mon Sep 18, 2023 7:06 am

All times are UTC




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 188 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 12:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 1:09 am
Posts: 8987
Location: He remembered Socks!
Rosalie wrote:
I don't think you realise how terrible Bush's economic policy is.

And I rather think that the condition of our environment, you know, the place we live in, is more important then these industries having to adapt to new methods. It's not so much about global warming as the fact that well, at the end of day, you're screwing yourselves over by polluting your air, seas, and whatever else ends up being tainted.

Another reason why extreme capitalism is dangerous.



woah woah woah, dont tell me your a hippie.

Capitalism is what makes the world go round, they make and you buy, you see that Computer your working on? bam, made by some computer company. you know a PS2 you have? BAM! Sony. as for the environment, its basically too far in the hole to fix, plus the end of the world is coming in, like...... 25 years, if not June Sixth 2006. theres no way to stop this from happening, it will happen someday, its Inevitable, all people like you who care about is just ProLonging the inevitable so theyre children will have a happy clean life but actually end up Gothic and screwing the Environment even more. so the best thing to do is just Keep going in the direction we are going, and if we die, we die.

_________________
ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 1:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 7:47 pm
Posts: 434
Quote:
woah woah woah, dont tell me your a hippie.


What? What's wrong with that?

Quote:
Capitalism is what makes the world go round, they make and you buy, you see that Computer your working on? bam, made by some computer company. you know a PS2 you have? BAM! Sony.


You mean the same Sony that used a computer virus as it's new copy protection?

Capitalism is one way of making the world go around. Unfortunately, it's pretty outdated and much better models based on socialism, or just plain improved capitalist models, have been concieved.

If your opinion is that capitalism is the best system, fair enough. But it's not the only system, and in my opinion, is far from the best.

And extreme capitalism, as in pure dedication to the dollar, never helps anyone. In Europe for instance, we have strong workers' unions. In America, you can still fire someone for being gay, purely because it might harm "company image".

Quote:
as for the environment, its basically too far in the hole to fix,


No it's not. What on earth gave you that idea? The environment will survive long after we're gone, actually. We can't kill it(at least the way we're trying to now), but we can damage it to the extent that it's unusable by us.

Quote:
plus the end of the world is coming in, like...... 25 years, if not June Sixth 2006.


What the hell?

Quote:
theres no way to stop this from happening, it will happen someday, its Inevitable,

all people like you who care about is just ProLonging the inevitable so theyre children will have a happy clean life but actually end up Gothic and screwing the Environment even more.


But living life is all about prolonging the inevitible. Why bother if you're just going to die someday? The enivornment is something which is capable of sustaining itself indefinitely, unlike us.

And how do goths screw up the enivornment?

Quote:
so the best thing to do is just Keep going in the direction we are going, and if we die, we die.


That's a terrible, nonsensical outlook on life. There are so many holes with it I'm not sure where to start.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 2:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 1:09 am
Posts: 8987
Location: He remembered Socks!
Rosalie wrote:
Quote:
woah woah woah, dont tell me your a hippie.


What? What's wrong with that?

nothin, i just never thopught that Pagans or wiccans would care much about the environment, and if they do, then im reading the wrong Grimorires.

Rosalie wrote:
Quote:
Capitalism is what makes the world go round, they make and you buy, you see that Computer your working on? bam, made by some computer company. you know a PS2 you have? BAM! Sony.


You mean the same Sony that used a computer virus as it's new copy protection?

Capitalism is one way of making the world go around. Unfortunately, it's pretty outdated and much better models based on socialism, or just plain improved capitalist models, have been concieved.

If your opinion is that capitalism is the best system, fair enough. But it's not the only system, and in my opinion, is far from the best.

And extreme capitalism, as in pure dedication to the dollar, never helps anyone. In Europe for instance, we have strong workers' unions. In America, you can still fire someone for being gay, purely because it might harm "company image".

Quote:
as for the environment, its basically too far in the hole to fix,


No it's not. What on earth gave you that idea? The environment will survive long after we're gone, actually. We can't kill it(at least the way we're trying to now), but we can damage it to the extent that it's unusable by us.

okay, you have me there

Rosalie wrote:
Quote:
plus the end of the world is coming in, like...... 25 years, if not June Sixth 2006.


What the hell?


just a Foretelling
Rosalie wrote:

And how do goths screw up the enivornment?


no, i mean screwing up the environment with everyone else.

Rosalie wrote:
Quote:
so the best thing to do is just Keep going in the direction we are going, and if we die, we die.


That's a terrible, nonsensical outlook on life. There are so many holes with it I'm not sure where to start.


yes its nonsensical, but as that guy who just walked down the street was thinking "Why should i care if someone in there is getting killed", everyone doesnt care about anyone they dont know, the only people who would help are Good Sumaritans, and even then noone cares.

_________________
ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 2:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 7:47 pm
Posts: 434
Quote:
nothin, i just never thopught that Pagans or wiccans would care much about the environment, and if they do, then im reading the wrong Grimorires.


Umm... Pagan religions are generally Earth based, if that's any help. Not only that, my patron(or matron) deity is the lady Gaia.

Quote:
yes its nonsensical, but as that guy who just walked down the street was thinking "Why should i care if someone in there is getting killed", everyone doesnt care about anyone they dont know, the only people who would help are Good Sumaritans, and even then noone cares.


I dunno, I generally tend to care about most things. I'm actually a very loving person when you get to know me. I just went from being perfectly cosy and normal to one day realising I wasn't, and that havlf the world couldn't really give a crap about my issues. So it was a bit of a nasty wakeup call, though I still fought for the same things beforehand, just not in quite the same way.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 2:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 1:09 am
Posts: 8987
Location: He remembered Socks!
Rosalie wrote:
Quote:
I'm actually a very loving person when you get to know me.


Then i would like to try

_________________
ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 2:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 12:15 am
Posts: 32
I think he should have ratified Kyoto, or really, should ratify it right now, because if nothing else it would help America's pitiful image. I really don't think it would encourage industries from moving out any faster than they already are. And besides, all of the countries that they're moving to, like China, Indonesia, and India have ratified Kyoto anyway, so they'd have to put up with it in any case. it can't hurt his image with the liberals, anyway.

_________________
hard work pays off later, but laziness pays off now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 4:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 7:47 pm
Posts: 434
Choc-o-Lardiac Arrest wrote:
Rosalie wrote:
Quote:
I'm actually a very loving person when you get to know me.


Then i would like to try


Are you sure about that?

Unless someone "On my side" hops along sometime soon, I'm probably going to leave or get banned or something :/

I actually only came here because I wanted to talk about H*R lol

I always get sucked into political stuff.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 4:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 1:06 am
Posts: 3040
Location: In Stu
Quote:
Unless someone "On my side" hops along sometime soon, I'm probably going to leave or get banned or something :/

I actually only came here because I wanted to talk about H*R lol

I always get sucked into political stuff.



Don't leave! It's fun arguing with you over stuff (I'm saying that in the nicest way possible). I agree with you alot, It's just some of your logic I dont get.

Toastpaint


PS: 500th post! Half way to 1000!

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 4:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:22 am
Posts: 5894
Location: SIBHoDC
Rosalie wrote:
Unless someone "On my side" hops along sometime soon, I'm probably going to leave or get banned or something :/


Most of us are on your side, we just disagree over the proper ways to express our opinions and the way we feel those who disagree with us should be treated.

_________________
beep beep I'm a Jeep


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 6:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 1:09 am
Posts: 8987
Location: He remembered Socks!
Rosalie wrote:
Choc-o-Lardiac Arrest wrote:
Rosalie wrote:
Quote:
I'm actually a very loving person when you get to know me.


Then i would like to try


Are you sure about that?

Unless someone "On my side" hops along sometime soon, I'm probably going to leave or get banned or something :/

I actually only came here because I wanted to talk about H*R lol

I always get sucked into political stuff.


to tell you the Truth Rosalie, i back you up 100%, but i gotta express my opinions on the matter, so then yes, i am sure i wanna get to know you better.

_________________
ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 1:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 10:46 pm
Posts: 993
Location: In the Palace of No Wai, sipping PWN JOO Chai
Rosalie wrote:
What's her face wrote:
"Our troubles and little wars"? "Peace and tolerence"? You seem to have a unique gift to either exaggerate situations grossly or minimise them grossly - depending on whether they effect you personally. Ask the Rwandan Tutis whether the '90s were peaceful, tolerant times for them - and, more importantly, whether they had the West to thank for this "peace and tolerence". Ask the Israelis and Palestinians what the 90s brought by way of "peace and tolerance". Ask the Bosnian orphans and widows if they consider the Kosovo War to be a "little war" - or the Haitians, or Chechnyans. Seriously - the world is not black-and-white, you know.


I said there were still troubles in the 90s, but the point is, we in the civilised world were moving forward. Now we've been set back so far. You can't honestly tell me that the 00s have been as productive as the 90s in terms of global politics.


To be honest, I may have been more harsh than necessary in my last post. But I'll maintain that the West wasn't moving forward in the '90s in terms of promoting worldwide peace and tolerance, and also that it wasn't just a case of George Bush coming in and messing things up. I don't share your belief that the West's progressiveness can be divorced from its actions in the rest of the world.

Take Rwanda for example. When Rwanda's president was assassinated, the UN knew something terrible would happen in that country. But what did they do? They packed up their operations and left - leaving the Tutis at the mercy of the Hutus' genocidal tendancies. Many UN staff say today that that's their greatest shame.

And yeah, the '00s were bad - but I'll say that a lot of what happened during the Bush administration were hang-overs from previous decades. Playing devil's advocate, if the Bush administration's aim in overthrowing Saddam was humanitarian - and that's a huge "if" - then they may have been right not to take the UN's reservations into account.

The Bush administration has that reputation of over-reacting, but the UN has a reputation of not acting quickly enough. (And to a lesser extent, as does the Clinton administration - because they were in the perfect position to stop the Rwandan genocide before it began. And it also mismanaged Kosovo badly, and it sold arms to rogue states like Iran.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: I'm tired of people nonstop insulting George Bush.
PostPosted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 12:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2005 9:11 pm
Posts: 949
Location: Underneath a big clock at the corner of 5th Avenue and 22nd Street...
jonfiredaman02 wrote:
I really it when people talk about how George Bush is evil, or how everyting he does is wrong. Don't get me wrong, i'm very anti-Bush, a democrat all the way. But it REALLY es me off when people ONLY talk about how everything George Bush does is wrong, or how George Bush is the worst person ever. George Bush is just a bad president. George Bush is not made of concentrated evil, he is not going to destroy the world, and he is not the only thing worth talking about. And really, he's only got 3 years left, which is not that long, if you think about it.

I know i'm gonna get flamed, but i'm ready for it.

edit: I'm not talking about wiki people specifically, just the people i know in general.

Your right Bush isn't going to destroy the world, Chaney is. There is no limit on how many times you can be vice president

_________________
Wow, It's been like three or 4 years since I've last been here


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 12:40 am 
Offline
Pizza Pizza
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2004 4:05 pm
Posts: 10451
Location: probably the penalty box
What's Her Face wrote:
the UN has a reputation of not acting quickly enough. (And to a lesser extent, as does the Clinton administration - because they were in the perfect position to stop the Rwandan genocide before it began. And it also mismanaged Kosovo badly, and it sold arms to rogue states like Iran.)

One of my former roommates served in Kosovo as part of the UN's KFOR. He REALLY didn't care for the way they managed things. One of his biggest beefs was that they weren't allowed to act outside of their "zones". The Serbs knew the boundaries of those "zones" and would do as they pleased outside of them while the UN troops were forced to sit on their hands and watch. Chris wasn't too happy about some of the stuff he had to watch. I understand that the UN can't just go in and shoot up the place, and I know they have to have boundaries, but when some of the bad things Chris watched happen 20-30 yards from you, and you order your troops to just sit there, something isn't right.

_________________
If you can't fix it with a hammer, you have an electrical problem.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 12:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 7:47 pm
Posts: 434
I'd still take the U.N. over the U.S. anyway. It's far from perfect, but it's at least representative of a diverse world country which makes it a little more difficult for propoganda to influence people's "decisions".


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 5:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2005 3:34 pm
Posts: 1571
Location: In the limestone cavern beneath this forum.
Any sensible pres. would have invaded a country working on weapons of mass destruction, the problem is that he stayed in thre.


Did you hear he once almost choked to death on a pretzel?

_________________
Clicky: Image Image Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 5:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 12:07 am
Posts: 1267
Location: In Bibendum's tire fold.
Cleverdan wrote:
Did you hear he once almost choked to death on a pretzel?


Even though that was funny, it could happen to anyone.
And coem on, its not like Bush was the first prez to be made fun of. I mean, look at the junk Clinton got, AND STILL DOES. Regean got his fair share of poking-fun at too.

_________________
TIRES TIRES TIRES


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 5:48 pm 
Offline
Pizza Pizza
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2004 4:05 pm
Posts: 10451
Location: probably the penalty box
Cleverdan wrote:
Any sensible pres. would have invaded a country working on weapons of mass destruction, the problem is that he stayed in thre.


We had to stay there... As much flack as Bush is taking for having troops in Iraq, he'd be taking double if he just pulled everyone out and left the people to fend for themselves. Had we not alienated ourselves from the UN, I would like to think we'd be getting a lot more help here.

As for the pretzel, that IS funny.. There are tons of people that have probably plotted to kill him. Imagine how they'd feel if a piece of baked dough would have done what they couldn't..
Oh well, at least he wasn't at a Japanese banquet.
What is it about the Bush family and food, anyway?

_________________
If you can't fix it with a hammer, you have an electrical problem.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:06 am
Posts: 1809
Location: lol.
Not to be a Bush-basher, but I find it hilarious how he changed the focus of the war in Iraq from "finding the WOMD" to "Operation Iraqi Freedom." I wish I could have seen his face when he had one of those "Oh crap!" moments and realized that there are no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 24, 2005 4:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2005 9:11 pm
Posts: 949
Location: Underneath a big clock at the corner of 5th Avenue and 22nd Street...
The only reason we are still in Iraq is for the oil

_________________
Wow, It's been like three or 4 years since I've last been here


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 4:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 6:07 pm
Posts: 528
Location: A white, cushioned room where I am all alone...
Then how come we are setting up elections and saving lives? The UN is corrupt and is freaking lazy. I am going to quote some one from the IRC on this. Bush definately isn't the best president, but he isn't the demon love child of Satan and Simon Cowel. Hurricane Katrina was unpreventable. Come on, who here really would have thought a month or five years before Katrina, "Man, we have to get better levee systems in New Orleans". Also, all of the people who say that we need to pull out of Iraq immediatly, how will the Kurds or the Shiites feel? Five months after an immediate pull out, Iraq will probably blow up due to all the insurgent attacks.

_________________
GENGHIS KHAN!!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 5:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:22 am
Posts: 5894
Location: SIBHoDC
Rogue Leader wrote:
Then how come we are setting up elections and saving lives?


Saving lives? Are you kidding? Since we've invaded, about 2300 Coalition soldiers have died, not to mention thousands of Iraqi soldiers and at least 100,000 Iraqi civilians have died.

Rogue Leader wrote:
Hurricane Katrina was unpreventable. Come on, who here really would have thought a month or five years before Katrina, "Man, we have to get better levee systems in New Orleans".


The hurricane was not preventable, but the miserably slow relief operations in the aftermath of Katrina were absolutely shameful. Michael Brown, the director of FEMA, and the former commissioner of the International Arabian Horse Association (great disaster management background there, by the way), was totally incompetent. Bush said he was doing a great job.

And how can you say no one thought the levees were inadequate? Take a look. I didn't know about the levee problem, but it's not my job to know. The people who did know didn't have the funding, thanks to the Iraq War.

Now, OK, I agree that personal attacks on the president are unnecessary. He seems like a nice enough guy. He just has no clue how to run a country.

_________________
beep beep I'm a Jeep


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 6:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2005 7:33 pm
Posts: 269
Rosalie wrote:
I'd still take the U.N. over the U.S. anyway. It's far from perfect, but it's at least representative of a diverse world country which makes it a little more difficult for propoganda to influence people's "decisions".


yeah, representative of a diverse world, mostly composed of dictatorships whose human rights records make Abu Ghraib look like Disneyland. the UN has been co-opted by totalitarians who use its democratic structure against democracy itself. i wouldn't trust the UN to vote fairly on plans for breakfast, let alone war.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 7:33 pm 
Offline
Pizza Pizza
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2004 4:05 pm
Posts: 10451
Location: probably the penalty box
JohnTheTinyCowboy wrote:
And how can you say no one thought the levees were inadequate? Take a look. I didn't know about the levee problem, but it's not my job to know. The people who did know didn't have the funding, thanks to the Iraq War.

Surely you're not blaming the levees breaking on Bush... If it IS his fault, then it's also Clinton's, Bush Sr's, Regan's, Carter's, Nixon's, Ford's...
The reason New Orleans flooded is because people built a city below sea level.. That's just a bad idea..

JohnTheTinyCowboy wrote:
Now, OK, I agree that personal attacks on the president are unnecessary. He seems like a nice enough guy. He just has no clue how to run a country.

I won't argue with you here. Well, maybe a little bit. He does know a little bit about running a country, but he doesn't seem to know a whole lot.. I kinda think we woulda been better with Jeb.

_________________
If you can't fix it with a hammer, you have an electrical problem.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 7:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:22 am
Posts: 5894
Location: SIBHoDC
StrongRad wrote:
Surely you're not blaming the levees breaking on Bush... If it IS his fault, then it's also Clinton's, Bush Sr's, Regan's, Carter's, Nixon's, Ford's...
The reason New Orleans flooded is because people built a city below sea level.. That's just a bad idea..


Oh, I'm not saying it was only Bush's fault, but something needed to be done about the levees, and Bush could have. It's just that some of the money earmarked for repairing the levees was used on the Iraq War.

StrongRad wrote:
I won't argue with you here. Well, maybe a little bit. He does know a little bit about running a country, but he doesn't seem to know a whole lot.. I kinda think we woulda been better with Jeb.


He knows how to get people to nod their heads. That's his specialty. He's just not good at actually running a country successfully.

And we might have been better with Jeb, but I for one have had enough Bushes in the White House, thank you.

_________________
beep beep I'm a Jeep


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 10:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 6:07 pm
Posts: 528
Location: A white, cushioned room where I am all alone...
JohnTheTinyCowboy wrote:
Rogue Leader wrote:
Then how come we are setting up elections and saving lives?


Saving lives? Are you kidding? Since we've invaded, about 2300 Coalition soldiers have died, not to mention thousands of Iraqi soldiers and at least 100,000 Iraqi civilians have died.

Rogue Leader wrote:
Hurricane Katrina was unpreventable. Come on, who here really would have thought a month or five years before Katrina, "Man, we have to get better levee systems in New Orleans".


The hurricane was not preventable, but the miserably slow relief operations in the aftermath of Katrina were absolutely shameful. Michael Brown, the director of FEMA, and the former commissioner of the International Arabian Horse Association (great disaster management background there, by the way), was totally incompetent. Bush said he was doing a great job.

And how can you say no one thought the levees were inadequate? Take a look. I didn't know about the levee problem, but it's not my job to know. The people who did know didn't have the funding, thanks to the Iraq War.

Now, OK, I agree that personal attacks on the president are unnecessary. He seems like a nice enough guy. He just has no clue how to run a country.

Hmm, yes, there are many casualties, but at least they weren't taken at the hands of their own government. Yes, the hurricane relief was horrible. Disgusting, as a matter of fact. Also, I think that it is the job of the local or state government to build hurricane protection. Sure, they can ask for federal funding, but to my knowledge, they didn't.

_________________
GENGHIS KHAN!!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 26, 2005 2:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:22 am
Posts: 5894
Location: SIBHoDC
Rogue Leader wrote:
Hmm, yes, there are many casualties, but at least they weren't taken at the hands of their own government.


That doesn't make the situation any better. I'd rather see less people dying, wouldn't you?

Rogue Leader wrote:
Also, I think that it is the job of the local or state government to build hurricane protection. Sure, they can ask for federal funding, but to my knowledge, they didn't.


Read the last paragraph of the article I linked to. They had federal funding, but much of it was redirected to the Iraq War.

_________________
beep beep I'm a Jeep


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 26, 2005 3:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 6:07 pm
Posts: 528
Location: A white, cushioned room where I am all alone...
JohnTheTinyCowboy wrote:
Rogue Leader wrote:
Hmm, yes, there are many casualties, but at least they weren't taken at the hands of their own government.


That doesn't make the situation any better. I'd rather see less people dying, wouldn't you?

Rogue Leader wrote:
Also, I think that it is the job of the local or state government to build hurricane protection. Sure, they can ask for federal funding, but to my knowledge, they didn't.


Read the last paragraph of the article I linked to. They had federal funding, but much of it was redirected to the Iraq War.

Hm, well you got me. Is it just me, or do humans have a tendancy to live in places that are bad to live in? And, yeah, less people dying is good. Very good indeed. Unto the Bush Bashing, it is seriously getting rediculous. Sure, critism is nessasry. Bush isn't doing good now. But, I want to see one issue of the NYT that doesn't bash Bush on the front page.

_________________
GENGHIS KHAN!!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 26, 2005 3:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 6:07 pm
Posts: 528
Location: A white, cushioned room where I am all alone...
JohnTheTinyCowboy wrote:
Rogue Leader wrote:
Hmm, yes, there are many casualties, but at least they weren't taken at the hands of their own government.


That doesn't make the situation any better. I'd rather see less people dying, wouldn't you?

Rogue Leader wrote:
Also, I think that it is the job of the local or state government to build hurricane protection. Sure, they can ask for federal funding, but to my knowledge, they didn't.


Read the last paragraph of the article I linked to. They had federal funding, but much of it was redirected to the Iraq War.

Hm, well you got me. Is it just me, or do humans have a tendancy to live in places that are bad to live in? And, yeah, less people dying is good. Very good indeed. Unto the Bush Bashing, it is seriously getting rediculous. Sure, critism is nessasry. Bush is doing pretty bad now. But, I want to see one issue of the NYT that doesn't bash Bush on the front page. I also want to watch CNN without someone putting a big X on Cheney's face.

_________________
GENGHIS KHAN!!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 3:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 1:49 am
Posts: 1022
Location: The Moon that Never Sets
For the most part, I am anti-bush, but it does get annoying when people are insanely against bush and talk about moving to Canada. There were some things he could've done better, but he wasn't insanely bad.

slightly offtopic, but I was reading some R&P pages today, and man was I reminded why I don't read them. I managed to get most of the scary andor heavy feeling out of my mind by watching...like... a minute of bobobobo, but I'm gonna have to waash the rest of it off with some good ol mindless Homestar.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 4:21 am 
Offline
Pizza Pizza
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2004 4:05 pm
Posts: 10451
Location: probably the penalty box
Rogue Leader wrote:
I also want to watch CNN without someone putting a big X on Cheney's face.

I couldn't find a picture of that, no matter how hard I tried.
Anyone got a picture of that? Jones, I'm looking in your direction, for some reason.

_________________
If you can't fix it with a hammer, you have an electrical problem.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 188 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group