DeathlyPallor wrote:
If I were being tactless i would have told you that being a Christian is a bad thing. Which I don't. It's the way you are asserting it that is. Preaching to people is not a good idea, especially where you are saying...
Right here, I see glaring hypocrisy. You see, if you were to truly accept and tolerate people's right to follow whatever religion they believe in, then you should accept and tolerate their right to follow those beliefs, which obviously include the belief that they are to go out and preach and minister and witness or whatever you want to call it to as many people as they can or deem necessary. Time and time again throughout this thread, they have said that they would not force their religion by trying to continue preaching after someone has openly expressed disinterest. But you apparently don't want to acknowledge that gracious attitude of theirs.
It'd be like, "Hey kids, wanna hear a story about elves?"
"No, not really...not interested in elves."
"Oh, okay. Well, I'll see you later. Let me know if you need anything."
"Okay, take care."
See? Harmless, isn't it?
DeathlyPallor wrote:
As long as you are doing something that will potentially hurt other people, I'm perfectly entitled to question.
But it's NOT potentially hurting other people. They're not chasing after them. Ian's not going to hold a gun to Rummy's head and say, "CONVERT OR GET BLASTED, FOOL!" It's not harmless to have an exchange of ideas and beliefs.
And after all, if you have no problem with people believing in Christianity, why do you have a problem with the potential for people to be converted to it? Yeah, yeah--they may be drunk, down on their luck, in the "wrong" state of mind...but if they have the right and ability to actively seek out Christianity or any other religious/spiritual belief on their own, then they would likewise have the right and ability to actively leave Christianity if they got converted one night and later on decided that it wasn't for them. Or am I missing something here?
One more thing: People shape religion to their morals far more than they shape their morals to their religion. In other words, there are plenty of "Christians" (or so they call themselves) out there who actively preach nothing but hate, prejudice, and bigotry--all of which they support with the Bible. If someone like Ian wants to offer someone a ride home, it's much, MUCH more like that it's because he's just a good person that way--NOT because he's afraid of being sent to Hell if he doesn't. Plenty of Christians wouldn't and don't do these sorts of things, because their morals don't guide them to do as such. So is it Christianity that is the cause for these morals, if so many people follow this one religion and yet have such a wide scope of what is considered moral? Or is it because PEOPLE are different and hold different morals, regardless of what their religion may suggest them to do? I believe that it's the latter.