Hazing is indeed illegal, and is defined by Dictionary.com as:
Dictionary.com wrote:
1. To persecute or harass with meaningless, difficult, or humiliating tasks.
2. To initiate, as into a college fraternity, by exacting humiliating performances from or playing rough practical jokes upon.
Now, this differs a bit from the definitions I learned when I joined
the fraternity I'm in. I joined a fraternity that abides by a strict no-hazing policy. However, because of legal ramifications, "hazing" can essentially be defined as "what the initiate [we weren't even allowed to call them "pledge" because of the negative connotations that name carries] would not feel comfortable doing." Even if it's doing something as simple and unoffensive (to most) as carrying around a markless book in public, if the initiate didn't want to do it, we couldn't make them, or else it was "hazing." There were some other definitions we had that our chapter used as a guideline to distinguish anything that might be construed as hazing, such as "Is this something that both actives and initiates are having to do, or just initiates?" and "Is this something I would be proud to show my mother?"
I have to admit that I did become a bit irked at times on how little we could do, because there are certain things that fraternities and sororities do that many on the outside see as "hazing," but many of us on the inside recognize as being an act to strengthen the sense of brotherhood (or sisterhood, in the case of sororities) between us and the initiates as well as amongst the initiates themselves. Nevertheless, we found plenty of ways to partake in many activities with our initiates that everyone enjoyed and that greatly strengthened our sense of fraternity among one another.
All in all, I agree that there's a lot of hazing that is unnecessary, because I saw plenty of other fraternities and sororities that hazed just for the sake of hazing--making their pledges do things that held no meaning whatsoever, just for their own kicks. This is hazing that I AM against. However, I would still like to see a bit of lee-way, at least if a campus' chapter can show district representatives as well as management of the university that certain acts that might be construed as "hazing" actually have a deeper, positive purpose.