|
This is a rather long sentence, so long, in fact, that it may annoy you to read this sentence, which, as stated before, is long enough to do just that, annoy you, because of the length of this long sentence which by the time you get to the end may annoy and/or confuse you enough that you will wish to kill me or do other not nice things to me to get revenge for making you read this long, confusing, annoying, repetitive, redundant, and of course self-referential sentence, which talks about itself, that of course being the meaning of self-referential, and the overall point of the game that is the thread that contains the post containing this sentence, which as previously stated, is both annoying, long, confusing, repetitive, redundant, and for the most part grammatically correct, except for that last part of it, because I said that the sentence is "both" six things, which of course is wrong because "both" refers to two things, not one, not three, not four, not five, and, most importantly to the matter at hand, not six, this being most important because, as I said, I mentioned six things while using "both", which is incorrect, and really quite a silly thing to do in this sentence, because up until that point, I'm pretty sure it was grammatically correct, although I wonder about the grammatical correctness of having a sentence this long, not because I think there is a rule about sentence length, just because I doubt it would be possible for me to write a sentence this long and remaining completely grammatically correct, although I'm sure some could, such as William Faulkner, James Joyce, and Jonathan Coe, who's names I got from Wikipedia's article on "Longest English Sentence", and who have all written sentences in excess of one thousand words, which is doubtless longer than this sentence, which as I said, is probably grammatically incorrect anyway, even though you may question what exactly grammatically correct is in this day and age, as many are of the opinion that language and grammar change over time as people speak and write differently, which may be a moot point anyway because that idea would not really apply to this sentence, as this is obviously no the way the English language is used in our time, nor is it likely to be used this way in the near future, as it is tiring both to write and read a sentence as long as this one, which, as I have stated several times, is quite long, annoying, confusing, repetitive, redundant, of questionable grammatical correctness, certainly not the way most people, or I should say English-speakers, write or speak, and tiring, which I can attest to and I'm sure you can as well, if you have in fact read this entire sentence.
_________________ 
|