I must be talking to a wall...
Me, 2 posts up wrote:
Whoa, either drop it or go elsewhere. This is a drama free zone. Savvy?
| Homestar Runner Wiki Forum http://forum.hrwiki.org/ |
|
| Who would you go gay for? http://forum.hrwiki.org/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=12706 |
Page 2 of 5 |
| Author: | Choc-o-Lardiac Arrest [ Wed Oct 24, 2007 10:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Whats with all the Gay jokes lately? |
|
| Author: | The Noid [ Wed Oct 24, 2007 11:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Oh yeah the guy from Journey. I'll turn his wheel in the sky. HI-FIVE |
|
| Author: | Duecex2 [ Wed Oct 24, 2007 11:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
The Noid wrote: Oh yeah the guy from Journey.
I'll turn his wheel in the sky. HI-FIVE Uh... I'd...give it to him anyway he wanted it? not stop believing him? UHHH |
|
| Author: | The Noid [ Wed Oct 24, 2007 11:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I'd be his small town girl. I'll live in his lonely world. I'll take his midnight train. I'll be born and raised in his Detroit. I'll hold onto his feeling. I'm getting tired of being Todd somebody else take my shift. |
|
| Author: | Shippinator Mandy [ Thu Oct 25, 2007 1:12 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Didymus wrote: I do. When the so-called "interpretation" is a mere attempt to bypass what the text actually says. "Interpretation" doesn't give you the right to ignore what it says, nor does it give you the right to make it mean what you want it to mean. You let the text shape you, not the other way around.
...-_- *palmface* Besides, gay people didn't CHOOSE to be gay... |
|
| Author: | Didymus [ Thu Oct 25, 2007 1:16 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
And why would that be a facepalm? It's the most sensible approach to the text. Otherwise, people can just make up anything they want and claim the Bible supports it. If anything, you're whole "Let's just reinterpret it to mean what we want it to mean" is the statement worthy of a facepalm. As I've made it abundantly clear on numerous occasions, as a theologian, I'm not interested in how people WANT to interpret the text. I'm only interested in what the text actually says. Maybe they can't choose who they are attracted to, but they certainly can choose how they act on those attractions. Nevertheless, it still doesn't change the meaning of the texts. |
|
| Author: | Einoo T. Spork [ Thu Oct 25, 2007 1:17 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Didymus wrote: And why would that be a facepalm? It's the most sensible approach to the text. Otherwise, people can just make up anything they want and claim the Bible supports it. If anything, you're whole "Let's just reinterpret it to mean what we want it to mean" is the statement worthy of a facepalm.
Perhaps you're not paying attention. R&P is one forum down from here. |
|
| Author: | Didymus [ Thu Oct 25, 2007 1:17 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Perhaps you weren't paying attention. I'm not the one who brought it back up just now. Mandy criticized me, and I responded. |
|
| Author: | Beyond the Grave [ Thu Oct 25, 2007 1:22 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Whoa, either drop it or go elsewhere. This is a drama free zone. Savvy? |
|
| Author: | Ninti [ Thu Oct 25, 2007 1:22 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
None of this about the bible would matter to people who don't believe in God. |
|
| Author: | Einoo T. Spork [ Thu Oct 25, 2007 1:22 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Didymus wrote: Perhaps you weren't paying attention. I'm not the one who brought it back up just now. Mandy criticized me, and I responded.
But you were the one who brought it up first, dude. You could have just stayed out of it, no harm done. And now I am also staying out of it. Me? I'd go gay for... OK, I have no idea. I suck. |
|
| Author: | Didymus [ Thu Oct 25, 2007 1:24 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I didn't start the thread. |
|
| Author: | Beyond the Grave [ Thu Oct 25, 2007 1:25 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
|
I must be talking to a wall... Me, 2 posts up wrote: Whoa, either drop it or go elsewhere. This is a drama free zone. Savvy?
|
|
| Author: | Einoo T. Spork [ Thu Oct 25, 2007 1:25 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Didymus wrote: I didn't start the thread.
It was always burning since the world's been turning? |
|
| Author: | Ju Ju Master [ Thu Oct 25, 2007 1:27 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
BTG's right. Any serious discussion or whatnot about whether homosexuality is right or wrong should go in R&P. So let's drop this. Me? I can't think of anyone but Moleman. No one else compares. |
|
| Author: | MikeMcG [ Thu Oct 25, 2007 1:28 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
nintendogs123 wrote: None of this about the bible would matter to people who don't believe in God.
I don't know but it has occurred to me The punishment that they threaten constantly It's only real if they could just convince me We're going down, down, down to Mephisto's Cafe Down, Down, Down to Mephisto's Cafe - Streetlight Manifesto I'd go gay for Mike Soprano from Streetlight. There's a rumor going around that he's gay, so half the battle's already won. |
|
| Author: | ramrod [ Thu Oct 25, 2007 2:36 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Ju Ju Master wrote: BTG's right. Any serious discussion or whatnot about whether homosexuality is right or wrong should go in R&P. So let's drop this. Exactly. Any more drama, and I'll lock the thread.
|
|
| Author: | Vitruvian Dude [ Thu Oct 25, 2007 2:37 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Ahmadinejad... Oh yeah... |
|
| Author: | Color Printer [ Thu Oct 25, 2007 2:39 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Einoo T. Spork wrote: Didymus wrote: I didn't start the thread. It was always burning since the world's been turning? So much stuff has happened on this forum we could actually write a parody of that song based off the HRWF. Oh, and I agree with Didy. No one. (Maybe Moleman. And that's an EXTREME maybe. [s]Nah.[/s]) |
|
| Author: | Acekirby [ Thu Oct 25, 2007 2:54 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Color Printer wrote: ([s]Maybe Moleman. And that's an EXTREME maybe.[/s] Nah.)
Don't resist, you know you want it. |
|
| Author: | StrongRad [ Thu Oct 25, 2007 2:56 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Vitruvian Dude wrote: Ahmadinejad... Oh yeah...
Umm... He's not gay. There are no gays in Iran. Just like there were no Jews in Berlin in the early 40's. Probably for the same reason, too. |
|
| Author: | Groovy Dudette [ Thu Oct 25, 2007 3:32 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
This is really disturbing ^^;;; Yeah. No one for me thank you. *calmly leaves before there's anymore drama* |
|
| Author: | ChickenLeg [ Thu Oct 25, 2007 3:55 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Um, we're forgetting one important flaw. NO ONE'S GAY FOR MOLEMAN! D: |
|
| Author: | Shippinator Mandy [ Thu Oct 25, 2007 3:57 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
ChickenLeg wrote: Um, we're forgetting one important flaw.
NO ONE'S GAY FOR MOLEMAN! D: I would be gay for Moleman if I was a guy. |
|
| Author: | IantheGecko [ Thu Oct 25, 2007 3:58 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
CL, that's in the Simpsonsverse. |
|
| Author: | ChickenLeg [ Thu Oct 25, 2007 4:01 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
True. I mean, Moleman's such a hot stud! Who WOULDN'T want to go gay for him? |
|
| Author: | The Noid [ Thu Oct 25, 2007 10:49 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Oh and Dr. Cox. |
|
| Author: | sci-fi greg [ Thu Oct 25, 2007 11:33 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Vitruvian Dude wrote: Ahmadinejad... Oh yeah...
|
|
| Author: | Duecex2 [ Thu Oct 25, 2007 11:53 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Who wouldn't want that? |
|
| Author: | Stinko girl 20x6 [ Thu Oct 25, 2007 11:55 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Helena Bonham Carter. For life. OR Lyn-z from Mindless Self Indulgence. Because she is sex. |
|
| Page 2 of 5 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|
