Homestar Runner Wiki Forum
http://forum.hrwiki.org/

Theories You Have
http://forum.hrwiki.org/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=14185
Page 2 of 2

Author:  Beyond the Grave [ Sun May 25, 2008 2:05 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Theories You Have

HipHoppityFrogOfValue wrote:
In order to grasp the truth, you must use your free will and freedom of thought. Do not let your mind get trapped within the religious or scientific paradigms. Religion and science are simply forms of control that were created by the ruling elite long before you were born. And thus, it is a shame that after being born on this planet, you were raised on either of those two lies.

Naturally, since you have been lied to about reality your entire life, any truthful revelations contradicting your false worldview may indeed appear to be far-fetched. But, to make things even worse, human beings are stubborn creatures who let their egos override everything else: Instead of learning about new information that does not fit within your current worldview, you would rather exercise your ego by letting others know what is and is not possible, merely based upon your personal knowledge and feeble understanding of what actually exists.

"The spirit of inquiry, the search for greater truth beyond religion and science, the profound seriousness of doing real thinking, philosophy and ontology – these are almost totally lacking in humanity. Humanity is therefore subhuman from lack of genuine intelligence....they automatically reject any emergent facts or realities that do not fit their brain dead cognitive pattern of belief and disbelief. They watch too much television" (Gabriel Chiron, "Truth is Greater Than Man").

Warning: Upon arriving at this post, you most likely have the strong, instinctual urge to automatically defend your current belief system and to reject all of this information. But, realize that attempting to use your belief system to filter out this information is, in fact, a nonsensical paradox, because it is your very belief system that is at issue here. Thus, instead of using a belief system to do your thinking for you, think for yourself via using your own brain (hopefully, you have one).

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
—Arthur Schopenhauer (German philosopher, 1788-1860)
Truthism 101: Matrix Basics
For those of you who have been asleep your
entire lives, here are some basic things about
reality that you just might want to catch up on.
How Human Beings Deny the Truth
Human beings on Earth like to blow off the truth by claiming that it is simply nonsense, calling it, for example, "funny," "hilarious," or "entertaining." In addition, they automatically disregard the truth messenger as being a "standard-issue schizophrenic who is obviously out of touch with reality." People desperately try to paint the truth messenger as being non-lucid, mentally unstable, illogical, and so self-absorbed that they can't see things for what they really are. This is a very convenient way to quickly discard the truth and go on with one's life.

And, when people come upon new information such as this, they erroneously assume that they have some sort of intellectual high ground over it. They start with the assumption that their belief system is correct, and, for whatever reason, vehemently refuse to acknowledge the possibility that they may have actually been deceived all along by their belief system. And thus, when confronted with counter-evidence, they automatically reject it.

As a matter of fact, human beings are actually pompous enough to think that their status quo worldview is more rational than the truth. They neglect to factor in the concept of intentional deception into their logical thought process, and thus fail to realize that the only reason why their worldview seems "rational" is because it is actually composed of a plethora of lies and distortions. So, in one of the greatest ironies ever, human beings think the lies that they are fed is reality, and that the truth, on the other hand, is crazy, unrealistic, and bizarre.

It is truly amazing how people are able to adopt one of Earth's belief systems (whether it be a specific religion or atheism), walk through the proverbial door of enlightenment (or so they think), shut the door behind them, and then never look back. Worse yet, they are actually proud not to look back--proud of their own stubbornness.

Once human beings are exposed to the truth, their decision to ridicule it manifests so quickly, one could mistakenly think that human beings are actually robots that were programmed to do so. Thus, if people really want to point the finger at someone who does not engage in serious critical thinking, they should go to the nearest mirror and point at themselves (rather than trying to point the finger at the truth messenger).

"There is far more to this world than taught in our schools, shown in the media, or proclaimed by the church and state. Most of mankind lives in a hypnotic trance, taking to be reality what is instead a twisted simulacrum of reality, a collective dream in which values are inverted, lies are taken as truth, and tyranny is accepted as security. They enjoy their ignorance and cling tightly to the misery that gives them identity" (Thomas Cox, montalk.net).
What the Truth is Not
The truth is the truth, and is not necessarily politically correct or socially acceptable. As a matter of fact, the truth is by no means politically correct or socially acceptable. So, if you came here looking for some conversation material or water-cooler material, then you came to the wrong post. The truth is greater than man, so it will not bow down to your social needs, personal needs, or insecurities. And, your feeble-minded reasoning does not and cannot negate that which actually exists.

The truth is not a function of human emotions, nor is it catered to the complex dynamics of human culture, interaction, or relationships. So, if the truth makes you feel "embarrassed" or "awkward," then that is your own problem.

As all truth messengers already know, human beings always stand in the way of one trying to spread the truth, via such tactics as peer pressure and ridicule. If one ever mentions the truth to a human being, the human being will quickly attempt to suck that person back into the mindless reality that is referred to, here on Earth, as the "real world." The truth is an enemy of humanity. So, if you are a slave to the human race, then you will forever keep the truth at arm's length. Therefore, you must pick one: humanity or the truth.

Humanity's mainstream conception of reality exists merely for the sake of keeping society functioning and orderly. However, human beings incorrectly think that this synthetic conception of reality is reality. Worse yet, fake truth seekers try to get the truth to conform to this synthetic conception of reality.

"Truth is beyond social acceptance. Truth is maladjusted and cannot fit into the massively dumb patterns of ordinary relationships and activities....Greater truth cannot come to those who never bring up the possibility of it to one another. People do not inquire beyond their knowledge because they do not want to have any disturbing shift in their knowledge pattern. The cognitive system is calm and stable through avoiding any disturbing new truth" (Gabriel Chiron, "Truth is Greater Than Man").
The Great Contradiction of
You So-Called "Rationalists"
You do not have access to Top Secret government information or to Top Secret government facilities. Nor are you a member of any of Earth's secret societies. In addition, you were not born 5,000 years ago; you were born only within the last 100 years, so you were not able to see history unfold with your own eyes.

Yet, despite all of these undeniable facts, you claim that you already know what the truth is. That is, just like how you know for a fact that 1+1=2, you also claim that you know for a fact what the truth is. So, um, how the hell is that possible???

Well, via compartmentalization, you are able to acknowledge the fact that government secrets exist and that secret societies exist, while simultaneously claiming that you, somehow, already know for a fact what the truth is. Wow, talk about being irrational!

In reality, you simply base the truth upon what the media tells you and what Earth's authority figures tell you. And, you are foolish enough to equate reading about an event in a history book to actually seeing that event with your own eyes. You don't believe religious texts, yet you still believe government texts such as history books and government belief systems such as science. As a practitioner of selective reasoning, how dare you call yourself a "rationalist"?

You trust Earth's authority figures because they are powerful and you think they are trustworthy. Obviously, however, these authority figures would never willingly incriminate themselves to you. If they did incriminate themselves to you, then you would no longer consider them to be legitimate authority figures.
Officialdom
Official doctrines, by definition, do not incriminate the officials who created them. If official doctrines did incriminate the officials who created them, then the officials would be looked down upon by the public, and therefore they and their doctrines would no longer be considered official. This is simple logic.

So, as you can see, official doctrines are by no means synonymous with the truth. Rather, official doctrines are simply doctrines that were designed to keep in power the very officials who created them.

Furthermore, the word "official" should not be associated with the word "rational." Science is indeed an official government doctrine, yet it is not completely rational. The scientific community, in a bizarre and irrational manner, completely blows off the concept of government secrets. Science, by design and necessity, always downplays the significance of the government's power.

Science must downplay the significance of the government's power because it is of the utmost importance that the ignorant followers of science who are not "in the know," such as the common atheist, only think within the framework of status quo reality. If science did not downplay the significance of the government's power, then people would quickly realize that science is bullcrap and that the status quo conception of reality is also bullcrap. In other words, if people knew what really goes on behind the scenes, then they would quickly realize that science is just another form of control, courtesy of the ruling elite.
Worshiping Authority
Note that the only people offended by this kind of anti-science information are those who worship Earth's authority figures. Although, these people will explain away such an accusation by claiming that science is synonymous with rationality, and therefore is simply the best way to seek the truth.

In actuality, however, science is merely pseudo-rational: Science rejects the existence of certain phenomena, not because these phenomena aren't real, but rather because the truth about these phenomena would incriminate the ruling elite. So, science is a fascist form of truth-seeking, and you pseudo-rationalists worship the dictatorial authority figures of science.
Your Ego
You have an ego, but you cannot turn it off. So, in this particular instance, you can use your ego in either one of two ways:

1.) Reject the information on this post due to the fact that you do not want to feel like you've been lied to your entire life.

or,

2.) Accept the information on this post, and then use it to make yourself feel superior to other human beings.
Morality
In essence, all of this talk about the mysterious and paranoid-sounding "suppression of the truth" simply boils down to the issue of morality. Human beings fail to realize that morality is not needed for those in power. Only the weak masses need morality, because they are not in complete control of their own destinies, and thus can be punished for any of their unsavory actions. So, when it comes to the matter of dispensing the truth, the ruling elite elect not to tell the masses the real truth about reality because they have absolutely no reason, motivation, or obligation to do so.

If one takes a step back and looks at the general attitude of Earth's authority figures, they will see that these authority figures do not exude the truth. Rather, when it comes to such tasks as disclosing information, these authority figures have an aura of shadiness. Instead of divulging all of the information that they know (such as Truthism.com does), they divulge as little information as possible.

So, getting back to the matter of the ruling elite dispensing the truth to the masses, a great analogy for this would be that of a lion nonchalantly swatting away a fly with its tail: The ruling elite will invent any bogus (yet still within reason) religion or scientific theory just to keep the masses from questioning reality. However, more than just temporarily quelling the masses, these bogus belief systems are actually able to control the masses because people foolishly end up believing in them and taking them to heart. So, in other words, instead of people interpreting a bogus belief system as simply being a possible theory or possible explanation of reality, people totally succumb to (that is, adopt) the bogus belief system because not only is the belief system within reason, but it also came from a very powerful authority figure.

The ruling elite are not anchored down by morality. They set the rules, invent the religions, invent the gods, invent the scientific theories, and do as they please. On the other hand, the masses are, by necessity, slaves to morality: If the common man does not behave properly, then, via the ruling elite's rules, he may be punished.

The logic of a common man is not the same as that of a man in power, because the common man's logic is infected with morality.
The Continuity of Power, and
Earth's So-Called "Ancient Mysteries"
It's hard for people to wrap their thick heads around the simple fact that the group of beings who built the ancient Egyptian pyramids, Stonehenge, and other so-called "ancient mysteries" is the very same group of beings who control Earth right now. Moreover, the group of beings who created ultra-popular religions such as Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, and Buddhism is, once again, the very same group of beings who control Earth right now. And, the group of beings who invented civilization, first in ancient Mesopotamia and then in ancient Egypt is, again, the very same group of beings who control Earth right now.

And yes, "group," not "groups."

The ruling elite's deception against humanity mainly exists at a fundamental level, affecting the aspects of reality that you erroneously assume are basic truths. After all, it's not as if you were born 5,000 years ago. Rather, you were born only within the last 100 years, and thus, were born into a world that was already neck-deep in deception. So, for example, your understanding of history is skewed, because the so-called "official" version of history that you were taught was written by the ruling elite themselves.
The Human Species
Human beings were created (that is, invented)
via genetic experiments that were conducted by
reptilian aliens. These reptilian aliens, also known
as the "Anunnaki" or the "Reptilians," still rule the
Earth to this day.

In fact, the Reptilians have indoctrinated you so
thoroughly that you are probably too weak-minded to
even fathom that they exist. Via religion, science, and
other forms of indoctrination (i.e., brainwashing), the
Reptilians have steered you (and the rest of humanity)
in the exact opposite direction of the truth, to the point
where the concept of an alien master/creator is
considered to be the ultimate crazy fantasy.

Strangely enough, though, here on Earth, the concept of an imaginary god is perfectly acceptable, and is by no means considered to be the "ultimate crazy fantasy." Yet, the concept of aliens is taboo, and is ultra-ridiculed by society in a freakish "hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil"-type fashion. Well, obviously, this is due to the fact that aliens are indeed real, whereas imaginary gods are not. The Reptilians simply got humans to focus their attention on imaginary gods and away from their true controllers. It's no coincidence that all of Earth's religions fail to acknowledge the existence of aliens. It's because the Reptilians are the very ones who created all of Earth's religions, and thus did not foolishly promote the concept of alien dominance over humanity.

"Many can accept the concept of 'God' or a Supreme Intelligence, but they are stifled when they try to comprehend alien beings. This is partially because of religious and other forms of programming and indoctrination. Many think so narrowly that they believe that the human race is the only intelligence in all Creation" (Amitakh Stanford, "Anunnaki Sewage Plants").

As with humanity, the truth is also an enemy of the Reptilians.

tl:dr

Author:  HHFOV [ Sun May 25, 2008 2:37 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Theories You Have

The Noid wrote:
so where was that copy and pasted from
http://www.truthism.com

Author:  TheGlitchmaster [ Tue Jun 17, 2008 7:17 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Theories You Have

I believe Missingno WILL return!

Author:  HHFOV [ Sat Jun 21, 2008 3:00 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Theories You Have

I believe that all uniform motion is relative, and that there is no absolute and well-defined state of rest (no privileged reference frames) – from mechanics to all the laws of physics, including both the laws of mechanics and of electrodynamics, whatever they may be. In addition, special relativity incorporates the principle that the speed of light is the same for all inertial observers regardless of the state of motion of the source.

This theory has a wide range of consequences which have been experimentally verified. Special relativity overthrows Newtonian notions of absolute space and time by stating that time and space are perceived differently by observers in different states of motion. It yields the equivalence of matter and energy, as expressed in the mass-energy equivalence formula E = mc2, where c is the speed of light in a vacuum. The predictions of special relativity agree well with Newtonian mechanics in their common realm of applicability, specifically in experiments in which all velocities are small compared to the speed of light.

The theory is termed "special" because it applies the principle of relativity only to inertial frames. Einstein developed general relativity to apply the principle generally, that is, to any frame, and that theory includes the effects of gravity. Strictly, special relativity cannot be applied in accelerating frames or in gravitational fields.

Special relativity reveals that c is not just the velocity of a certain phenomenon, namely the propagation of electromagnetic radiation (light)—but rather a fundamental feature of the way space and time are unified as spacetime. A consequence of this is that it is impossible for any particle that has mass to be accelerated to the speed of light.

Author:  TheGlitchmaster [ Sat Jun 21, 2008 3:02 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Theories You Have

As a tl;dr person, I think ^ means nothing can ever stop moving (?)

Author:  HHFOV [ Sat Jun 21, 2008 3:11 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Theories You Have

No, it's Einstein's theory of relativity.

Or one of them, anyway.

It was a joke/play on words on the thread title, since the definition of a "theory" scientifically is so different from what we commonly use, and the fact of something being a theory implies, in science, that something already has sufficient evidence to substantiate it.

Author:  TheGlitchmaster [ Sat Jun 21, 2008 3:12 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Theories You Have

Ah. I just read "movement" and "infinete" and that's what I got. Xp

Author:  HHFOV [ Sat Jun 21, 2008 3:15 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Theories You Have

TheGlitchmaster wrote:
Xp
stop

Author:  Einoo T. Spork [ Sat Jun 21, 2008 5:34 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Theories You Have

HHFOV wrote:
It was a joke/play on words on the thread title, since the definition of a "theory" scientifically is so different from what we commonly use, and the fact of something being a theory implies, in science, that something already has sufficient evidence to substantiate it.


*crickets*

Author:  Biscuithead [ Sat Jun 21, 2008 5:43 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Theories You Have

HHFOV wrote:
It was a joke/play on words on the thread title, since the definition of a "theory" scientifically is so different from what we commonly use, and the fact of something being a theory implies, in science, that something already has sufficient evidence to substantiate it.


Such as, for example, "hey that one animal looks like that other one lets call it a theory".

Author:  Rusty [ Sat Jun 21, 2008 5:44 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Theories You Have

Biscuithead wrote:
HHFOV wrote:
It was a joke/play on words on the thread title, since the definition of a "theory" scientifically is so different from what we commonly use, and the fact of something being a theory implies, in science, that something already has sufficient evidence to substantiate it.


Such as, for example, "hey that one animal looks like that other one lets call it a theory".


Hey.

Hey.

No.

Also, HHFOV is totally right.

Author:  Acekirby [ Sat Jun 21, 2008 6:12 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Theories You Have

Agreed.

Quote:
According to the National Academy of Sciences,

Some scientific explanations are so well established that no new evidence is likely to alter them. The explanation becomes a scientific theory. In everyday language a theory means a hunch or speculation. Not so in science. In science, the word theory refers to a comprehensive explanation of an important feature of nature that is supported by many facts gathered over time. Theories also allow scientists to make predictions about as yet unobserved phenomena.

Theory of Evolution, Theory of Relativity, and the Big Bang Theory are all examples.

Author:  Biscuithead [ Sat Jun 21, 2008 6:19 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Theories You Have

I agree with the definition of "theory", I just disagree with the labelling of two of those ideas as theories.

Author:  Jitka [ Sat Jun 21, 2008 6:28 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Theories You Have

Religion clouds the mind!

Let SCIENCE be your God!


(there should be a religion that worships science, let's start one)

Author:  Biscuithead [ Sat Jun 21, 2008 6:30 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Theories You Have

Your sig. is a good start. Let us worship the great prophet Einstein.

Author:  Jitka [ Sat Jun 21, 2008 6:32 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Theories You Have

He's dead, we need someone like Stephen Hawking.

Author:  Biscuithead [ Sat Jun 21, 2008 6:49 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Theories You Have

Of course, our scientific religion has no heaven or hell (until they can be observed), so dead people can't be prophets. But is Einstein really dead?

We hypothesise that he is dead based on general knowledge and human life expectancy, but have you observed his dead body? If not, we can only say there is a high probability that he is dead. Until such an observation is made, he is simultaneously alive and dead due to our uncertainty.

Oh man, this is an awesome religion...

Author:  Jitka [ Sat Jun 21, 2008 6:52 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Theories You Have

It doesn't matter whether he is truly alive or dead, if he is alive he will make his presence known. Until then, we need someone who is demonstrably alive, such as me.

Or, again, Stephen Hawking.

Author:  Biscuithead [ Sat Jun 21, 2008 6:59 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Theories You Have

Stephen Hawking is a good choice then.

Or perhaps anyone who makes a hypothesis is a prophet of science. I like that idea.

Author:  SnowyFox [ Sat Jun 21, 2008 7:02 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Theories You Have

My theory is that the curvature of spacetime is directly related to the four-momentum of whatever matter and radiation are present.

Author:  just a username [ Sat Jun 21, 2008 10:50 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Theories You Have

My theory about the moon landings is NASA did land on the moon, the US Goverment just tried to make a fake moon landing to make people think that the Soviets were trying to fake a moon landing, digracing the Soviet Union.

Author:  HHFOV [ Sat Jun 21, 2008 3:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Theories You Have

Biscuithead wrote:
I agree with the definition of "theory", I just disagree with the labelling of two of those ideas as theories.
The unanimous consensus of the entire scientific community would like to have a word with you.

Author:  Jitka [ Sat Jun 21, 2008 5:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Theories You Have

just a username wrote:
My theory about the moon landings is NASA did land on the moon, the US Goverment just tried to make a fake moon landing to make people think that the Soviets were trying to fake a moon landing, digracing the Soviet Union.


what

Page 2 of 2 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/