the_chekt wrote:
WOOHOO!
YEEHAW!
| Homestar Runner Wiki Forum http://forum.hrwiki.org/ |
|
| Boxers or Briefs? http://forum.hrwiki.org/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=6973 |
Page 3 of 4 |
| Author: | Cybernetic Teenybopper [ Wed May 24, 2006 12:09 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Ladies sho can wear boxers! Should know, since I used to meself. I don't know where you get that "wedgie-free" notion about 'em, since the more loose fabric there is, the more things get bunched up... unless we're discussing that awful, awful stuff they try to make us ladies wear, which is the absolute WORST. But that's another topic entirely. |
|
| Author: | Ian911299 [ Wed May 24, 2006 3:27 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
the_chekt wrote: WOOHOO!
YEEHAW! |
|
| Author: | ready for prime time [ Wed May 24, 2006 9:58 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
i don't care. what i care about is those satin boxer shorts. i just don't like it. |
|
| Author: | Chekt [ Wed May 24, 2006 6:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Lu Bu wrote: the_chekt wrote: WOOHOO! I hope those aren't yours... no, no i just did a google image search for "boxers" and among other mildly "disturbing" pictures, i got this one. |
|
| Author: | Cybernetic Teenybopper [ Wed May 24, 2006 7:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
 "I image searched for 'the blue ones,' but I didn't find anything. Well... nothing pleasant, anyway."
 "Umm, try using 'and' and 'or.'"
"Oooh, Boolean operators!"
Sorry, had to. |
|
| Author: | Homsar22 [ Thu Jun 01, 2006 7:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
There is no option for "no" wth |
|
| Author: | Sarge [ Thu Jun 01, 2006 10:24 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Homsar22 wrote: There is no option for "no" wth
Well, you either wear boxers or you wear briefs. If you don't wear either, then hit the "don't care" option. It's not rocket science. 
|
|
| Author: | Ian911299 [ Thu Jun 01, 2006 3:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Sarge wrote: Homsar22 wrote: There is no option for "no" wth Well, you either wear boxers or you wear briefs. If you don't wear either, then hit the "don't care" option. It's not rocket science. I don't really understand why someone wouldn't want to wear underwear though. |
|
| Author: | Sarge [ Thu Jun 01, 2006 8:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Ian911299 wrote: Sarge wrote: Homsar22 wrote: There is no option for "no" wth Well, you either wear boxers or you wear briefs. If you don't wear either, then hit the "don't care" option. It's not rocket science. I don't really understand why someone wouldn't want to wear underwear though. It's stricktly a comfort issue. Unless it's a religious issue. Or a nudist issue. Sometimes a medical issue. Or a "it's too damm hot for clothes" issue. I often issue long pointless lists of things I have some awareness of. There's no point to them. Just ignore the man with the mug of Root Beer. Nothing to see here. Move along. 
|
|
| Author: | DESTROY US ALL! [ Thu Jun 01, 2006 9:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
What about my boxer-briefs? |
|
| Author: | Chekt [ Thu Jun 01, 2006 10:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
what if you wear womens' underwear? wait... nevermind forget i said that NO I DONT! AAAAAAH! |
|
| Author: | Shopiom [ Thu Jun 01, 2006 10:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Heh. That reminds me of that part in Shrek 2. |
|
| Author: | Sarge [ Thu Jun 01, 2006 11:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Shopiom wrote: Heh. That reminds me of that part in Shrek 2.
Um, what part is that, them. "References without context are more confusing than nothing at all" - Isaac Asimov. |
|
| Author: | Shopiom [ Thu Jun 01, 2006 11:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Alright, Pinocchio had to tell a lie, so Donkey made up a random lie for him to tell; "I'm wearin' ladies' underwear!" He said it, but nothing happened. Then Shrek said, "You wear ladies' underwear?" to which Pinocchio replied, "Do not!" Then his nose grew. |
|
| Author: | Ian911299 [ Fri Jun 02, 2006 4:11 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Sarge wrote: Ian911299 wrote: Sarge wrote: Homsar22 wrote: There is no option for "no" wth Well, you either wear boxers or you wear briefs. If you don't wear either, then hit the "don't care" option. It's not rocket science. I don't really understand why someone wouldn't want to wear underwear though. It's stricktly a comfort issue. Unless it's a religious issue. Or a nudist issue. Sometimes a medical issue. Or a "it's too **** hot for clothes" issue. I often issue long pointless lists of things I have some awareness of. There's no point to them. Just ignore the man with the mug of Root Beer. Nothing to see here. Move along. No, it's okay. Your opinion is important too. Your reasons make sense, so thanks for explaining it to me. BTW... The H*R Wiki Rules wrote: 6. No foul language. This includes the word 'Hell' (except as used to describe the place), any words containing sexual innuendo, and any words used to describe excrement other than 'crap', 'manure', 'excrement', and any others of its nature that are brought to our attention.
|
|
| Author: | Sarge [ Fri Jun 02, 2006 5:17 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Ian911299 wrote: The H*R Wiki Rules wrote: 6. No foul language. This includes the word 'Hell' (except as used to describe the place), any words containing sexual innuendo, and any words used to describe excrement other than 'crap', 'manure', 'excrement', and any others of its nature that are brought to our attention. Duely noted. |
|
| Author: | Chekt [ Fri Jun 02, 2006 11:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
what if you just eat underwear? |
|
| Author: | ramrod [ Sat Jun 03, 2006 12:11 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
the_chekt wrote: what if you just eat underwear? Motion to strike that visual image from my mind Judge?
|
|
| Author: | SEAN'D! [ Tue Jun 06, 2006 12:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Breifs, much more comfortable. Boxers are too... open. ramrod wrote: Funkstar wrote: Lunar Jesty wrote: You forgot an option for our forum ladies.  I have quite an experiance working with female undergarments. I should start my own poll. Yeah, no one pull the old ladies clothes joke here. |
|
| Author: | Ian911299 [ Tue Jun 06, 2006 2:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
SEAN'D! wrote: Breifs, much more comfortable.
Boxers are too... open. ramrod wrote: Funkstar wrote: Lunar Jesty wrote: You forgot an option for our forum ladies. I have quite an experiance working with female undergarments. I should start my own poll. Yeah, no one pull the old ladies clothes joke here. What? That they smell like grandma's? |
|
| Author: | ButtdanceHR [ Wed Jun 14, 2006 8:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Boxers for me! I used to wear them briefs though. There is this hillarious weird al song called Freeballin'. And oh my god it is hillarious. (I think it's by weird al, but all the lyric sights don't have the song under him.) It goes something like this: I'm a loose guy, not crazy 'bout undies. Love tickin' them, and scratching them too. And jeez, I just crack up when I hear it. It's originally Freefallin' by Tom Petty. |
|
| Author: | Jimmie [ Wed Jun 14, 2006 9:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Boxers. Briefs (or "tighty-whities) are too embarassing. Especially in gym class. |
|
| Author: | buhubs [ Wed Jun 14, 2006 11:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
legal briefs over boxers, legal briefs all the way man. Don't know about underdrawers though. |
|
| Author: | Acekirby [ Thu Jun 15, 2006 2:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
ramrod wrote: the_chekt wrote: what if you just eat underwear? Motion to strike that visual image from my mind Judge?Motion denied. Unless I can get it out of my head as well. |
|
| Author: | Lu Bu [ Thu Jun 15, 2006 2:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
What's so wrong about eating underwear? It woul be a good source of fiber. |
|
| Author: | buhubs [ Thu Jun 15, 2006 7:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
You are the weirdest link! goodbye! |
|
| Author: | ramrod [ Thu Jun 15, 2006 11:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Lu Bu wrote: What's so wrong about eating underwear? It woul be a good source of fiber. So is eating tree bark. And it's easily found.
|
|
| Author: | Occasional JD [ Fri Jun 16, 2006 10:49 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
So is basiclly everything not poisinous, I belive. |
|
| Author: | buhubs [ Sat Jun 17, 2006 2:14 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
 This smiley seems to come up alot in posts here when people say they don't really care about underwear.
sometimes it's best for everybody's sake to wear something beneath pants, and sometimes you need air |
|
| Author: | Einoo T. Spork [ Sat Jun 17, 2006 3:50 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
ButtdanceHR wrote: Boxers for me! I used to wear them briefs though.
There is this hillarious weird al song called Freeballin'. And oh my god it is hillarious. (I think it's by weird al, but all the lyric sights don't have the song under him.) It goes something like this: I'm a loose guy, not crazy 'bout undies. Love tickin' them, and scratching them too. And jeez, I just crack up when I hear it. It's originally Freefallin' by Tom Petty. NOT BY WEIRD AL'd! Seriously. It's not. There are a lot of songs on the Internet floating around that are supposed to be by Weird Al. Trust me, they usually aren't. I wear briefs. Is that bad? >_> |
|
| Page 3 of 4 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|