Duke, these are all very interesting questions. They contain a lot of empty speculation about God's motives, of which none of us are in any place to make, but interesting questions none the less.
Quote:
Anyway, if god exists and is all-knowing, all-powerfull, and has a divine plan, then free will cannot exist. The future, our destinies, every little detail in our lives, would allready have been decided by him, and we'd simply be playing out the roles in his little toy universe.
Maybe, maybe not. I'm not sure how much of what we believe to be free will is actually his work. But there is a faulty assumption in your thinking: you jump from the whole idea that our fates are already foreseen to the conclusion that he is the one who set that course. Maybe he is and maybe he isn't, but the conclusion does not connect to the premise very well.
Quote:
Imagine you've watched a move 50,000 times and know every little detail in the movie. Could any part of the movie possibly scare you, make you laugh, make you cry, etc?
Actually, I don't know how many times I've seen
The Holy Grail, but it makes me laugh every single time.
Quote:
I think not. If god is all-knowing, his life would be very dull indeed.
An interesting assumption on your part, and one easily disproved. Human beings get bored because they feel incomplete. Think about it: when you feel bored, isn't it because you are longing for something to take up some empty space inside you? I do not think God gets bored because, in his essence, he is already complete; there are no empty places within him for him to try to fill.
Quote:
Would god concider killing himself to end the boredom? Could he? If he's all-powerfull, he should be able to. But if he's immortal, he should not be able to... could he be both all-powerfull and immortal? It would seem to me, those attributes are incompatitible.
C. S. Lewis once put it this way (or as close as I can remember it, anyway): "Nonsense is nonsense. Putting 'God can' or 'God can't' in front of it does not make it any less nonsense." This postulation isn't terribly different from the one HHFOV posted a few pages back, about God creating a rock so big he can't move it. One could just as easily argue, based on the definition of God's perfection, that he must necessarily exist (See Ontological Argument). I have always found the Ontological Argument to be a rather vain speculation of word definitions, with no real substance, but then again, I've always felt the same about such arguments, similarly based on vain speculation of word definitions.